IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i10p2540-2550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recasting research into children's experiences of parental mental illness: Beyond risk and resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Gladstone, Brenda McConnell
  • Boydell, Katherine M.
  • McKeever, Patricia

Abstract

Children who live with a mentally ill parent are viewed primarily as being 'at risk' of developing a mental illness themselves and those who remain well are considered extraordinarily resilient. This particular risk/resilience discourse is embedded within larger contemporary discourses about risk and childhood. Childhood is seen as a critical period of development during which children need protection due to their physical and psychological vulnerabilities. In this paper, the implications of this dominant casting of children are explored and it is argued that the conceptual repertoire about those living with a mentally ill parent should be expanded. A critique of the literature that established the risk/resilience discourse is followed by a discussion of research about parenting with a mental illness within which children are surprisingly absent. Recent thinking about children arising out of the 'new' social studies of childhood is summarized to illustrate its resistance to the hegemonic image of children as passive, developing, 'unfinished' persons. A recasting of children as complex young persons who have competencies as well as vulnerabilities linked to their developmental stages, would lead to different lines of inquiry about children's experiences of mental illness in a parent.

Suggested Citation

  • Gladstone, Brenda McConnell & Boydell, Katherine M. & McKeever, Patricia, 2006. "Recasting research into children's experiences of parental mental illness: Beyond risk and resilience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2540-2550, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:10:p:2540-2550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00565-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trondsen, Marianne & Sandaunet, Anne-Grete, 2009. "The dual role of the action researcher," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 13-20, February.
    2. Grove, Christine & Riebschleger, Joanne & Bosch, Annick & Cavanaugh, Daniel & van der Ende, Peter C., 2017. "Expert views of children's knowledge needs regarding parental mental illness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 249-255.
    3. Margareta Östman & Maria Afzelius, 2011. "Children’s Representatives in Psychiatric Services: What Is the Outcome?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(2), pages 144-152, March.
    4. Rojalini Sahoo & Damodar Suar, 2009. "Do Young Carers Deserve Justice? Young Caring in the Context of Illness," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 21(1), pages 133-150, January.
    5. Emma Loudon & Gavin Davidson & Kathryn Higgins & Anne Grant, 2022. "PROTOCOL: The support needs of families living with parental mental illness: A qualitative systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    6. Heljä Pihkala & Mikael Sandlund & Anita Cederström, 2012. "Children in Beardslee’s family intervention: Relieved by understanding of parental mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(6), pages 623-628, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:10:p:2540-2550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.