IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i7p1505-1515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The somatising effect of clinical consultation: What patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms

Author

Listed:
  • Ring, Adele
  • Dowrick, Christopher F.
  • Humphris, Gerry M.
  • Davies, John
  • Salmon, Peter

Abstract

Patients with symptoms that doctors cannot explain by physical disease are common in primary care. That they receive disproportionate amounts of physical intervention, which is largely ineffective and sometimes iatrogenic, is usually attributed to patients' belief that they are physically diseased, their denial of psychological difficulties, and their demand for physical intervention. The evidence for this view has mainly been doctors' subjective reports. By observing what patients and doctors say in consultation, we tested hypotheses arising from recent qualitative evidence. In particular, that physical intervention is proposed more often by general practitioners (GPs) than by patients, that most patients indicate psychosocial needs, and that GPs offer little effective explanation or empathy. Consultations of 420 consecutive patients identified by British GPs as presenting medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded, utterance-by-utterance, using a specially developed coding scheme based on the previous qualitative analyses of these kinds of consultation. Physical intervention was, as predicted, proposed more often by GPs than patients. Also as predicted, almost all patients provided cues concerning psychosocial difficulties or their need for explanation. Although, contrary to prediction, most GPs did provide explanations other than physical disease, most also suggested physical disease. Few GPs empathised. The findings suggest that the explanation for the high level of physical intervention for MUS lies in GPs' responses rather than patients' demands, and we propose that explanations for 'somatisation' should be sought in doctor-patient interaction rather than in patients' psychopathology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ring, Adele & Dowrick, Christopher F. & Humphris, Gerry M. & Davies, John & Salmon, Peter, 2005. "The somatising effect of clinical consultation: What patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1505-1515, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:7:p:1505-1515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00109-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peters, Sarah & Stanley, Ian & Rose, Michael & Salmon, Peter, 0. "Patients with medically unexplained symptoms: Sources of patients' authority and implications for demands on medical care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(4-5), pages 559-565, February.
    2. Trudy van der Weijden & Monique van Velsen & Geert-Jan Dinant & Cathelijne M. van Hasselt & Richard Grol, 2003. "Unexplained Complaints in General Practice: Prevalence, Patients' Expectations, and Professionals' Test-Ordering Behavior," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(3), pages 226-231, May.
    3. Ong, L. M. L. & de Haes, J. C. J. M. & Hoos, A. M. & Lammes, F. B., 1995. "Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 903-918, April.
    4. Butler, N.M. & Campion, P.D. & Cox, A.D., 1992. "Exploration of doctor and patient agendas in general practice consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1145-1155, November.
    5. Ford, Sarah & Hall, Angela & Ratcliffe, Denise & Fallowfield, Lesley, 2000. "The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analysing interviews of oncologists and patients with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 553-566, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Williams, Brian & Dowell, Jon & Humphris, Gerry & Themessl-Huber, Markus & Rushmer, Rosemary & Ricketts, Ian & Boyle, Paul & Sullivan, Frank, 2010. "Developing a longitudinal database of routinely recorded primary care consultations linked to service use and outcome data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 473-478, February.
    2. Bauer, Amy M. & Chen, Chih-Nan & Alegría, Margarita, 2012. "Associations of physical symptoms with perceived need for and use of mental health services among Latino and Asian Americans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(6), pages 1128-1133.
    3. Dan Guo & Maria Kleinstäuber & Malcolm Henry Johnson & Frederick Sundram, 2019. "Evaluating Commonalities Across Medically Unexplained Symptoms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-7, March.
    4. Rosie Webster & Andrew R Thompson & Paul Norman, 2015. "‘Everything's fine, so why does it happen?’ A qualitative investigation of patients' perceptions of noncardiac chest pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1936-1945, July.
    5. Clemente, Ignasi & Lee, Seung-Hee & Heritage, John, 2008. "Children in chronic pain: Promoting pediatric patients' symptom accounts in tertiary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1418-1428, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian Wangler & Michael Jansky, 2024. "Somatoform Disorders in Primary Care—An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on Experiences, Challenges and Coping Strategies of General Practitioners in the Federal Republic of Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Miller, Nancy & Weinstein, Marcie, 2007. "Participation and knowledge related to a nursing home admission decision among a working age population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 303-313, January.
    3. Beach, Wayne A. & Easter, David W. & Good, Jeffrey S. & Pigeron, Elisa, 2005. "Disclosing and responding to cancer "fears" during oncology interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 893-910, February.
    4. Stockl, Andrea, 2007. "Complex syndromes, ambivalent diagnosis, and existential uncertainty: The case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1549-1559, October.
    5. Blume, Andreas, 2018. "Failure of common knowledge of language in common-interest communication games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 132-155.
    6. Rhona Hogg & Janet Hanley & Pam Smith, 2018. "Learning lessons from the analysis of patient complaints relating to staff attitudes, behaviour and communication, using the concept of emotional labour," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1004-1012, March.
    7. Solomon, Josie & Knapp, Peter & Raynor, D.K. & Atkin, Karl, 2013. "Worlds apart? An exploration of prescribing and medicine-taking decisions by patients, GPs and local policy makers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 264-272.
    8. Roscigno, Cecelia I. & Savage, Teresa A. & Grant, Gerald & Philipsen, Gerry, 2013. "How healthcare provider talk with parents of children following severe traumatic brain injury is perceived in early acute care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 32-39.
    9. Liu, Xiaoxiao & Ben Liu, Qianqian, 2024. "Superior medical resources or geographic proximity? The joint effects of regional medical resource disparity, geographic distance, and cultural differences on online medical consultation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    10. Udo Schneider, 2002. "Beidseitige Informationsasymmetrien in der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung: Implikationen für die GKV," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(4), pages 447-458.
    11. Lawrence, Vanessa & McCombie, Catherine & Nikolakopoulos, Georgios & Morgan, Craig, 2021. "Navigating the mental health system: Narratives of identity and recovery among people with psychosis across ethnic groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Mélanie Sustersic & Aurélie Gauchet & Anaïs Kernou & Charlotte Gibert & Alison Foote & Céline Vermorel & Jean-Luc Bosson, 2018. "A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Archontissa Maria Kanavaki & Courtney Jane Lightfoot & Jared Palmer & Thomas James Wilkinson & Alice Caroline Smith & Ceri Rhiannon Jones, 2021. "Kidney Care during COVID-19 in the UK: Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on Impacts on Care Quality and Staff Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Sjaak Molenaar & Mirjam A.G. Sprangers & Fenna C.E. Postma-Schuit & Emiel J. Th. Rutgers & Josje Noorlander & Joop Hendriks & Hanneke C.J.M. De Haes, 2000. "Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision Aids," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 20(1), pages 112-127, January.
    15. Clemente, Ignasi & Lee, Seung-Hee & Heritage, John, 2008. "Children in chronic pain: Promoting pediatric patients' symptom accounts in tertiary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1418-1428, March.
    16. Chandwani, Rajesh & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2015. "Managing Emotions: Emotional Labor or Emotional Enrichment," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-42, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    17. Madden, Sue & Sim, Julius, 2006. "Creating meaning in fibromyalgia syndrome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2962-2973, December.
    18. Gibson, Mark & Neil Jenkings, K. & Wilson, Rob & Purves, Ian, 2006. "Verbal prescribing in general practice consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1684-1698, September.
    19. Charlotte T. Lee & Susanne Phillips & Susan Tiso & Camille Fitzpatrick, 2019. "Exploring Interpersonal Relationships in a Nurse-Managed Clinic and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    20. Vrana, Scott R. & Vrana, Dylan T. & Penner, Louis A. & Eggly, Susan & Slatcher, Richard B. & Hagiwara, Nao, 2018. "Latent Semantic Analysis: A new measure of patient-physician communication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 22-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:7:p:1505-1515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.