IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v57y2003i12p2465-2470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The continuum of patient satisfaction--from satisfied to very satisfied

Author

Listed:
  • Collins, Karen
  • O'Cathain, Alicia

Abstract

In a move towards a more informed understanding of the concept of satisfaction, this paper aims to explore how 30 dermatology patients describe what it meant to them to be either satisfied or very satisfied with their healthcare. This was undertaken using in-depth interviews and the findings suggest that participants clearly differentiated between being satisfied or very satisfied with healthcare. While for some participants, being satisfied with healthcare was described in terms of care being adequate or average, for others it meant that there were aspects of healthcare that could be improved, or that something was missing and that optimal care was not achieved. Care and management had been 'acceptable' or 'sufficient' but not 'outstanding.' In contrast, being very satisfied with particular aspects of healthcare was described in ways that suggested that the service was not only more than adequate, but ranged from 'better than average' to 'outstanding', i.e. optimal care had been provided. This observation of a 'continuum of satisfaction' has specific and important implications for the future analysis and presentation of patient satisfaction surveys. It is suggested that attention to the differences between the two constructs provides a useful means to highlighting areas of patient concern and that researchers reporting the results of patient satisfaction surveys should cease to collapse them.

Suggested Citation

  • Collins, Karen & O'Cathain, Alicia, 2003. "The continuum of patient satisfaction--from satisfied to very satisfied," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 2465-2470, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:12:p:2465-2470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00098-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenhua Wang & Jeannie Haggerty & Ekaterina (Katya) Loban & Xiaoyun Liu, 2019. "Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Bikker, Annemieke P. & Thompson, Andrew G.H., 2006. "Predicting and comparing patient satisfaction in four different modes of health care across a nation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1671-1683, September.
    3. Das, Jishnu & Sohnesen, Thomas Pave, 2006. "Patient satisfaction, doctor effort, and interview location : evidence from Paraguay," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4086, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Patient satisfaction UK;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:12:p:2465-2470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.