IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v55y2002i5p721-732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bad news from the patient's perspective: an analysis of the written narratives of newly diagnosed cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Salander, Pär

Abstract

Papers in clinical journals dealing with how to tell cancer patients bad news rely mostly on the opinion of the physician. The purpose of the present study was to contribute with knowledge from the patient's perspective by analysing how patients with recently diagnosed cancer narrate the manner in which they received their diagnosis. A consecutive series of 187 patients who had received their cancer diagnosis 2-8 months prior to the outset of this study were asked to describe the manner in which they learned of their diagnosis in writing. A crucial finding from the submitted 138 written narratives was that the participants often described experiences from the first contact with hospital staff to the end of their treatment, rather than as a single instance of diagnosis communication. The relational meaning of these experiences was obvious. Information on treatment was of the utmost significance. No one required more prognostic information. From the perspective of the physicians, "bad news" focuses on how to provide information about diagnosis and prognosis in the course of a single diagnostic consultation. From the patient's perspective, "bad news" reflects the process of being diseased by cancer, and how medical services are available when one is in need of establishing a helpful relationship. In this relationship information about diagnosis and treatment is more a means than an end.

Suggested Citation

  • Salander, Pär, 2002. "Bad news from the patient's perspective: an analysis of the written narratives of newly diagnosed cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 721-732, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:5:p:721-732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00198-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hedgecoe, Adam, 2005. "'At the point at which you can do something about it, then it becomes more relevant': Informed consent in the pharmacogenetic clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1201-1210, September.
    2. Schaepe, Karen Sue, 2011. "Bad news and first impressions: Patient and family caregiver accounts of learning the cancer diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 912-921, September.
    3. Cecilia Hultstrand Ahlin & Åsa Hörnsten & Anna‐Britt Coe & Mikael Lilja & Senada Hajdarevic, 2019. "Wishing to be perceived as a capable and resourceful person—A qualitative study of melanoma patients’ experiences of the contact and interaction with healthcare professionals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1223-1232, April.
    4. Macdonald, Sara & Conway, Elaine & Bikker, Annemieke & Browne, Susan & Robb, Kathryn & Campbell, Christine & Steele, Robert JC. & Weller, David & Macleod, Una, 2019. "Making sense of bodily sensations: Do shared cancer narratives influence symptom appraisal?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 31-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:5:p:721-732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.