IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v53y2001i3p333-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation for disabled persons in developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Evans, P. J.
  • Zinkin, P.
  • Harpham, T.
  • Chaudury, G.

Abstract

Almost all governments and non-governmental organisations in developing countries use a community-based rehabilitation (CBR) approach to work with disabled people. Although disabled people's organisations reject the categorisation of disability in individual terms, 'medical rehabilitation' is still regarded as an important but time limited process within rehabilitation. The paper lists measures and methods used in a comprehensive evaluation, and presents a practical method to examine the quality of medical rehabilitation. The method was developed and applied in an evaluation of service needs and service provision for disabled people in low-income communities, for the Ministry of Welfare, Government of India. The method described is a tracer approach. It assesses quality in three aspects of medical rehabilitation: The method differs from most others in that it is process oriented, as opposed to output oriented. The method meets the challenges of providing low-cost assessment of a difficult outcome measure (the quality of medical rehabilitation), within a complex process (CBR). It is anticipated that the tracer method will be useful to the objective evaluation of disability services throughout the developing world.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans, P. J. & Zinkin, P. & Harpham, T. & Chaudury, G., 2001. "Evaluation of community-based rehabilitation for disabled persons in developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 333-348, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:53:y:2001:i:3:p:333-348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00321-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonard, Kenneth & Masatu, Melkiory C., 2006. "Outpatient process quality evaluation and the Hawthorne Effect," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2330-2340, November.
    2. Marco Tofani & Giuseppina Esposito & Anna Berardi & Giovanni Galeoto & Silvia Iorio & Maurizio Marceca, 2021. "Community-Based Rehabilitation Indicators: Validation and Preliminary Evidence for Disability in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Xanthe Hunt & Melissa Bradshaw & Steyn Lodewyk Vogel & Alberto Vasquez Encalada & Shanice Eksteen & Marguerite Schneider & Kelly Chunga & Leslie Swartz, 2022. "Community Support for Persons with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:53:y:2001:i:3:p:333-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.