IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v52y2001i7p985-998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do patients expect of psychiatric services? A systematic and critical review of empirical studies

Author

Listed:
  • Noble, Lorraine M.
  • Douglas, Brian C.
  • Newman, Stanton P.

Abstract

The article reviews literature concerning patients' expectations of psychiatric care. Early research (pre-1980) is outlined, followed by a systematic review of 21 studies fulfilling specific inclusion criteria from 1980 onwards. Overall, patients expected to improve as a result of psychiatric treatment, and had higher expectations of the helpfulness of psychological and combined treatments than other interventions. Few studies considered expectations of the process of psychiatric care or determinants of expectations. The majority of studies focused on examining the relation between expectations and outcomes. There were indications that expectations of improvement were linked to clinical outcomes, although the relationship appeared to be complex. There was also some evidence that when expectations of the process of care were incongruent with the service provided, outcomes were poorer. The findings of studies in the systematic review were generally congruent with earlier work (pre-1980), although expectations of improvement appeared to be higher in the later studies. Interventions to prepare patients for what to expect were found to have beneficial effects on attendance, satisfaction and the accuracy of expectations about the process of psychiatric care. Future research should focus on developing valid and reliable measures for use in different settings, and on determining the mechanism by which expectations may relate to outcomes, including clinical outcomes, attendance and satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Noble, Lorraine M. & Douglas, Brian C. & Newman, Stanton P., 2001. "What do patients expect of psychiatric services? A systematic and critical review of empirical studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 985-998, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:7:p:985-998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00210-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khazaie, Habibolah & Rezaie, Leeba & Shahdipour, Niloofar & Weaver, Patrick, 2016. "Exploration of the reasons for dropping out of psychotherapy: A qualitative study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 23-30.
    2. Agneta Schröder & Gerd Ahlström & Bodil Wilde Larsson, 2006. "Patients’ perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 93-102, January.
    3. Johnson, Blair T. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L., 2018. "What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 218-226.
    4. Juan Francisco Roldán-Merino & Manuel Tomás-Jiménez & Agneta Schröder & Lars-Olov Lundqvist & Montserrat Puig-Llobet & Antonio R. Moreno-Poyato & Marta Domínguez del Campo & Sara Sanchez-Balcells & Ma, 2023. "Quality in Psychiatric Care in the Community Mental Health Setting from the Perspective of Patients and Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:7:p:985-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.