IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v51y2000i6p821-829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health policy and the new genetics

Author

Listed:
  • Kaufert, Patricia A.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to stimulate debate on the implications of the new genetics for health policy. Although there are different streams within the social science literature on the new genetics, the primary focus has been on the meaning of genetic testing from the perspective of the individual tested. While essential to understand, it does not add much to the health policy debate. A very different type of information has been produced by the public health and epidemiological literature, focused on screening for genetic disease and concerned with rates of detection, costs and benefits, and evaluation criteria. These data are very important to planning and implementing the type of prenatal screening program already in existence; they do not deal with issues central to the new genetics, such as commercialization, patenting and insurance. The problem is how best these topics should be researched. The final section of the paper suggests that given a phenomenon -- the new genetics -- which is both multifaceted and very complex, very new and yet with strong historical and cultural roots, we need a matching research agenda. One that breaks out of traditional paradigms separating one method from another and seeks information on the new genetics wherever it may be found.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaufert, Patricia A., 2000. "Health policy and the new genetics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 821-829, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:6:p:821-829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00063-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gillett, Grant & McKergow, Felicity, 2007. "Genes, ownership, and indigenous reality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 2093-2104, November.
    2. Kuo, Wen-Hua, 2011. "Techno-politics of genomic nationalism: Tracing genomics and its use in drug regulation in Japan and Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1200-1207.
    3. Hall, Edward, 2005. "The 'geneticisation' of heart disease: a network analysis of the production of new genetic knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2673-2683, June.
    4. Van Hoyweghen, Ine & Horstman, Klasien & Schepers, Rita, 2006. "Making the normal deviant: The introduction of predictive medicine in life insurance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 1225-1235, September.
    5. Vincenzo Pavone & Flor Arias, 2010. "Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing in Spain: beyond the geneticization thesis," Working Papers 1012, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    6. Christine Arentz, 2012. "Auswirkungen von Gentests in der Krankenversicherung," Otto-Wolff-Institut Discussion Paper Series 04/2012, Otto-Wolff-Institut für Wirtschaftsordnung, Köln, Deutschland.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    New genetics Health policy Research;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:6:p:821-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.