IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i3p309-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Task and socioemotional behaviors of physicians: a test of reciprocity and social interaction theories in analogue physician-patient encounters

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, Carlos A.
  • Aruguete, Mara S.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to assess social interaction and reciprocity theories as explanations for patient responses to a physician in a medical consultation. Social interaction theory predicts that patients mostly recognize and react to socioemotional behavior of their physicians due to a lack of understanding of physician task behaviors or a preoccupation with anxiety. Reciprocity theory predicts that patients recognize socioemotional and task behaviors of their physicians, and they respond to these behaviors in thematically similar ways. We examined these hypotheses by having subjects view one of four videotapes which varied in physician task behavior (thorough or minimum levels of explanation of etiology, symptoms, and treatment) and physician socioemotional behavior (high or low levels of concern and affection displayed verbally and non-verbally). Results supported the general proposition of social interaction theory in that high levels of socioemotional behavior of the physician increased measures of patient self-disclosure, trust, satisfaction, and likelihood of recommending the physician. Physician task behavior had no effect on patient response to the physician, a finding inconsistent with reciprocity theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, Carlos A. & Aruguete, Mara S., 2000. "Task and socioemotional behaviors of physicians: a test of reciprocity and social interaction theories in analogue physician-patient encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 309-315, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:3:p:309-315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00245-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vigier, Marta & Thorson, Katherine R. & Andritsch, Elisabeth & Stoeger, Herbert & Suerth, Leonie & Farkas, Clemens & Schwerdtfeger, Andreas R., 2021. "Physiological linkage during interactions between doctors and cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Ludmila Marcinowicz & Teresa Pawlikowska & Jerzy Konstantynowicz & Slawomir Chlabicz, 2014. "New Insight into the Role of Patients During Medical Appointments: A Synthesis of Three Qualitative Studies," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(3), pages 313-318, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:3:p:309-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.