IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i2p247-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tuberculosis in Pakistan: socio-cultural constraints and opportunities in treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Amir
  • Walley, John
  • Newell, James
  • Imdad, Naghma

Abstract

This study explores the extent to which factors related to individuals, the care provision process, and the cultural context influence the behaviour of tuberculosis patients attending TB clinics in rural Pakistan, and examines the effects of disease on their personal lives. Thirty-six patients attending three TB treatment clinics were interviewed in depth. These patients were stratified by stage of treatment (treatment proceeding, treatment completed, default), sex and by rural/urban status. Results indicate that the majority of patients were very poor, but nonetheless initially chose to attend private practitioners. Normally their disease was correctly diagnosed as tuberculosis only after repeated visits to a succession of health care providers. Patients' knowledge about their disease was limited, and doctors gave incorrect or only very limited health education. Most patients reported dissatisfaction with care provided. Almost all patients reported problems with access to treatment, both in terms of time and money; this was particularly true of women, whose freedom to travel in Pakistan is limited. Potential causes of default appeared to be more closely linked to deficiencies in treatment provision rather than patients' unwillingness to comply. Largely because of a perception that TB was incurable, respondents were generally unwilling to disclose that they were undergoing or had undergone TB treatment. For reasons related to confidential access to treatment, this could lead to default, perpetuating the perception of incurability, and hence causing a vicious circle. For TB programmes to be successful in Pakistan, it is essential that this circle is broken; and this can only be done through provision of good quality TB care and education to improve the population's understanding that TB can be cured. In addition, patients' unwillingness to disclose to health care providers that they had already received previous treatment meant that many patients were prescribed incorrect treatment regimes, potentially leading to the emergence of drug-resistant TB. In common with other researchers' findings, no clear differences were found between those who had completed treatment and those who had defaulted from treatment. This study was performed to provide information to assist the researchers to design potential TB treatment delivery strategies, and has proved invaluable for this purpose. Strategies based on findings from the study are currently being assessed using a randomised controlled trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Amir & Walley, John & Newell, James & Imdad, Naghma, 2000. "Tuberculosis in Pakistan: socio-cultural constraints and opportunities in treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 247-254, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:2:p:247-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00279-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahed Hossain & Mohammad Abdul Quaiyum & Khalequ Zaman & Sayera Banu & Mohammad Ashaque Husain & Mohammad Akramul Islam & Erwin Cooreman & Martien Borgdorff & Knut Lönnroth & Abdul Hamid Salim & Fran, 2012. "Socio Economic Position in TB Prevalence and Access to Services: Results from a Population Prevalence Survey and a Facility-Based Survey in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Awan, Masood Sarwar & Waqas, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad Amir & Sarwar, Muhammad, 2011. "Measurement of SF-6D utility among patients with active tuberculosis," MPRA Paper 31816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Macq, Jean & Solis, Alejandro & Martinez, Guillermo & Martiny, Patrick & Dujardin, Bruno, 2005. "An exploration of the social stigma of tuberculosis in five "municipios" of Nicaragua to reflect on local interventions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 205-217, October.
    4. Syed Mustafa Ali & Naveed Anjum & Muhammad Ishaq & Farah Naureen & Arif Noor & Aamna Rashid & Syed Muslim Abbas & Kerri Viney, 2019. "Community Knowledge about Tuberculosis and Perception about Tuberculosis-Associated Stigma in Pakistan," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Rachel M Anderson de Cuevas & Najla Al-Sonboli & Nasher Al-Aghbari & Mohammed A Yassin & Luis E Cuevas & Sally J Theobald, 2014. "Barriers to Completing TB Diagnosis in Yemen: Services Should Respond to Patients' Needs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-8, September.
    6. Atun, Rifat A. & Baeza, Juan & Drobniewski, Francis & Levicheva, Vera & Coker, Richard J., 2005. "Implementing WHO DOTS strategy in the Russian Federation: stakeholder attitudes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 122-132, October.
    7. Collins, Charles D & Green, Andrew T & Newell, James N, 2002. "The relationship between disease control strategies and health system development: the case of TB," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 141-160, November.
    8. Xu, B. & Fochsen, G. & Xiu, Y. & Thorson, A. & Kemp, J. R. & Jiang, Q. W., 2004. "Perceptions and experiences of health care seeking and access to TB care--a qualitative study in Rural Jiangsu Province, China," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 139-149, August.
    9. Natasha Chida & Zara Ansari & Hamidah Hussain & Maria Jaswal & Stephen Symes & Aamir J Khan & Shama Mohammed, 2015. "Determinants of Default from Tuberculosis Treatment among Patients with Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis in Karachi, Pakistan: A Mixed Methods Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:2:p:247-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.