IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46y1998i2p193-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Declining professional dominance?: Trends in the proletarianisation of primary care in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Barnett, J. Ross
  • Barnett, Pauline
  • Kearns, Robin A.

Abstract

This paper explores the relevance of the proletarianisation thesis to the emergence of new forms of managed primary care in New Zealand. This concern is of particular interest because the primary care sector has persisted virtually unchanged, since the birth of the welfare state in 1938, despite numerous past state attempts at reform. Since 1993 collective action on the part of general practitioners has resulted in the formation of Independent Practice Associations (IPAs). In terms of Light's (1993) idea of countervailing trends to proletarianisation, IPA development represents a pre-emptive strategy designed to prevent the introduction of the kind of managerialism imposed on the secondary sector where some loss of autonomy has been sustained by health care professionals. At the macro-level, therefore, there has been little change in GP autonomy although at the micro-scale there has been some loss of freedom as the development of IPAs ironically has meant that the degree of control by GPs over the content of their work has changed. The results suggest that the notion of the profession acting as a countervailing force has been borne out. Furthermore, the proposition inherent in modern organisation-environment relations literature, that organizations not only adapt to their environment but may actively seek to change it receives some support.

Suggested Citation

  • Barnett, J. Ross & Barnett, Pauline & Kearns, Robin A., 1998. "Declining professional dominance?: Trends in the proletarianisation of primary care in New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 193-207, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:2:p:193-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00150-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ashton, Toni & Cumming, Jacqueline & McLean, Janet, 2004. "Contracting for health services in a public health system: the New Zealand experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 21-31, July.
    2. Dew, Kevin & Roorda, Mathea, 2001. "Institutional innovation and the handling of health complaints in New Zealand: an assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 27-44, July.
    3. Toth, Federico, 2015. "Sovereigns under Siege. How the medical profession is changing in Italy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 128-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:2:p:193-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.