IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i8p1277-1288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reactance theory and patient noncompliance

Author

Listed:
  • Fogarty, Jeanne S.

Abstract

With surprising frequency, and to the considerable dismay of health care professionals, patients both subtly and overtly refuse to cooperate with medical treatment. Despite considerable empirical and theoretical attention, and an abundance of interventions designed to combat it, noncompliance continues. Its persistence is accompanied by considerable costs borne by patients and society alike. The theory of psychological reactance sheds new light on the phenomenon. Reactance theory proposes that a perceived threat to an individual's freedom generates a motivational state aimed at recapturing the affected freedom and preventing the loss of others. In a medical context, patients' perceptions of threats to their freedom or control may induce noncompliance. This theory permits integration of many of the seemingly disparate and/or contradictory findings, and may afford professionals new opportunities for improving patient compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Fogarty, Jeanne S., 1997. "Reactance theory and patient noncompliance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1277-1288, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:8:p:1277-1288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00055-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goncalo, Jack A. & Duguid, Michelle M., 2012. "Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not)," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 14-23.
    2. Law, Stephanie & Daftary, Amrita & Mitnick, Carole D. & Dheda, Keertan & Menzies, Dick, 2019. "Disrupting a cycle of mistrust: A constructivist grounded theory study on patient-provider trust in TB care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Shapiro, Stephen L. & Drayer, Joris & Dwyer, Brendan, 2020. "An examination of consumer reactance to daily fantasy sport and sport gambling regulatory restrictions," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 797-809.
    4. Corrigan, Patrick W. & Salzer, Mark S., 2003. "The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 109-121, May.
    5. Vijay Payal Bharti & Elizabeth T. Gratz & M. Paula Fitzgerald, 2022. "“You can't make me do it!” A model of consumer compliance," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 120-140, March.
    6. Burkert, Silke & Scholz, Urte & Gralla, Oliver & Roigas, Jan & Knoll, Nina, 2011. "Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 783-792, September.
    7. Jacob M. Marszalek & Patricia L. Hager & Jacquelyn N. Anderson & Jack T. Waddell, 2021. "Interrelationships Among Dimensions of Flow and Reactance," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 3385-3412, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:8:p:1277-1288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.