IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i9p1299-1308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reactivity and repeatability of hygiene behaviour: Structured observations from Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Cousens, Simon
  • Kanki, Bernadette
  • Toure, Seydou
  • Diallo, Ibrahim
  • Curtis, Valerie

Abstract

If interventions promoting improved hygiene behaviour to prevent childhood diarrhoea are to be implemented and evaluated, valid methods for measuring this behaviour will be required. This paper presents findings from a study to investigate the use of structured observations to measure hygiene behaviour in Burkina Faso. Two hundred mothers with young children (2-36 months) were observed on several occasions, with particular attention focused on events/behaviour surrounding defaecation. Child defaecation occurred most often in a potty (67% of occasions). Stools were most often disposed of into a latrine (79%). Following defaecation the child's bottom was usually rinsed using water alone with a bare hand (76%). Subsequent hand washing by the mother/caretaker was much rarer (29%). None of these behaviours appeared "reactive" to the presence of the observer. Less common behaviours showed some evidence of reactivity. The frequency of child defaecation in the yard increased over the course of three observations (5% to 16%; P = 0.01) and the proportion of occasions on which the child was observed to be cleaned after defaecation declined (95% to 85%; P = 0.01). Mothers usually took with them to the latrine a water recipient (91%). Hand washing after leaving the latrine was observed on 30% of occasions. This proportion declined from 36% to 22% over three observations (P = 0.05). Defaecation by older siblings (aged 3-5 years) was usually into a potty (48%) or directly into a latrine (30%). There was no evidence that this behaviour was reactive. The repeatability of behaviours at the individual level was generally low. The site of index child defaecation ([kappa] = 0.27), how the child's bottom was cleaned ([kappa] = -0.01) and whether the caretaker washed her hands afterwards ([kappa] = 0.26) all showed low repeatability. The method of stool disposal was more repeatable ([kappa] = 0.73). Hand washing by mothers after using the latrine showed moderate repeatability ([kappa] = 0.40). Older sibling's defaecation behaviour had excellent repeatability ([kappa] = 0.90). Our findings suggest that, in studies which aim to measure behaviour at the population level, structured observations may provide a useful tool. Studies which investigate links between hygiene behaviour and diarrhoea incidence at the individual level will require repeated observations of mothers and children since measuring behaviour during a single observation will lead to misclassification of exposure status, resulting in bias which could mask any underlying association. This is likely to be very costly.

Suggested Citation

  • Cousens, Simon & Kanki, Bernadette & Toure, Seydou & Diallo, Ibrahim & Curtis, Valerie, 1996. "Reactivity and repeatability of hygiene behaviour: Structured observations from Burkina Faso," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1299-1308, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:9:p:1299-1308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00380-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amy J Pickering & Annalise G Blum & Robert F Breiman & Pavani K Ram & Jennifer Davis, 2014. "Video Surveillance Captures Student Hand Hygiene Behavior, Reactivity to Observation, and Peer Influence in Kenyan Primary Schools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-7, March.
    2. Alexander A. Weinreb, 2014. "Heterophily in rural Malawi," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(50), pages 1477-1502.
    3. Nepal C Dey, 2015. "Achievements of BRAC Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Programme Towards Millennium Development Goals and Beyond," Working Papers id:7608, eSocialSciences.
    4. Chase, Claire & Do, Quy-Toan, 2012. "Handwashing behavior change at scale : evidence from a randomized evaluation in Vietnam," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6207, The World Bank.
    5. Aunger, Robert & Schmidt, Wolf-Peter & Ranpura, Ashish & Coombes, Yolande & Maina, Peninnah Mukiri & Matiko, Carol Nkatha & Curtis, Valerie, 2010. "Three kinds of psychological determinants for hand-washing behaviour in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 383-391, February.
    6. Sarah K Summers & Rochelle Rainey & Maneet Kaur & Jay P Graham, 2015. "CO2 and H2O: Understanding Different Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Carbon Credits to Finance Household Water Treatment Projects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:9:p:1299-1308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.