IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v41y1995i12p1647-1651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children

Author

Listed:
  • Harth, S. C.
  • Thong, Y. H.

Abstract

We interviewed 64 parents by questionnaire after completion of a clinical trial involving their children for their perceptions and attitudes about informed consent. The results show that only a small minority realized that drug trials are designed to assess not only efficacy but safety as well. More worrisome was the majority of parents who felt that drug trials conducted by hospitals are of no or low risks. Moreover, a significant minority offered the view that the strict informed consent procedures we followed were unnecessary because they would do what the doctor advised. Even more worrisome was the small percentage of parents who realized that a signed consent form was primarily meant to protect their rights, and only one-third of the parents knew of their right to withdraw their child unconditionally from the trial at any time. These findings suggest that there may be significant attitudinal barriers to parental understanding of the informed consent process.

Suggested Citation

  • Harth, S. C. & Thong, Y. H., 1995. "Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(12), pages 1647-1651, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:12:p:1647-1651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00058-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hedgecoe, Adam, 2005. "'At the point at which you can do something about it, then it becomes more relevant': Informed consent in the pharmacogenetic clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1201-1210, September.
    2. Snowdon, Claire & Elbourne, Diana & Garcia, Jo, 2006. ""It was a snap decision": Parental and professional perspectives on the speed of decisions about participation in perinatal randomised controlled trials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(9), pages 2279-2290, May.
    3. Barata, Paula C. & Gucciardi, Enza & Ahmad, Farah & Stewart, Donna E., 2006. "Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 479-490, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:41:y:1995:i:12:p:1647-1651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.