IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v38y1994i2p351-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mothering on crack cocaine: A grounded theory analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kearney, Margaret H.
  • Murphy, Sheigla
  • Rosenbaum, Marsha

Abstract

Mothers who use crack cocaine are commonly believed to be selfish, uncaring, and neglectful of their children. For this paper, the grounded theory method was used to analyze 68 semi-structured depth interviews with cocaine-using mothers. These women's views of motherhood, the strategies they used to manage mothering on cocaine, and the contextual influences on mothering outcomes were explored. Contrary to popular assumptions, the women highly valued motherhood and held firm standards for childrearing. Mothers were concerned about the possible risks to their children and used a process of defensive compensation to protect both their children and their maternal identities from the negative influences of crack cocaine. When unable to fulfil their maternal responsibilities by other means, some mothers placed their children with family members, and others lost custody involuntarily. When children were forcibly removed, mothers often increased their drug use to cope with the loss. Social and economic conditions influenced the outcomes of mothering on crack.

Suggested Citation

  • Kearney, Margaret H. & Murphy, Sheigla & Rosenbaum, Marsha, 1994. "Mothering on crack cocaine: A grounded theory analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 351-361, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:2:p:351-361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90405-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rhodes, Tim & Bernays, Sarah & Houmoller, Kathrin, 2010. "Parents who use drugs: Accounting for damage and its limitation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1489-1497, October.
    2. Haight, Wendy & Ostler, Teresa & Black, James & Sheridan, Kathryn & Kingery, Linda, 2007. "A child's-eye view of parent methamphetamine abuse: Implications for helping foster families to succeed," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Haight, Wendy & Jacobsen, Teresa & Black, James & Kingery, Linda & Sheridan, Kathryn & Mulder, Cray, 2005. ""In these bleak days": Parent methamphetamine abuse and child welfare in the rural Midwest," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 949-971, August.
    4. Haight, Wendy L. & Carter-Black, Janet D. & Sheridan, Kathryn, 2009. "Mothers' experience of methamphetamine addiction: A case-based analysis of rural, midwestern women," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 71-77, January.
    5. Owczarzak, Jill & Kazi, Asiya K. & Mazhnaya, Alyona & Alpatova, Polina & Zub, Tatyana & Filippova, Olga & Phillips, Sarah D., 2021. "“You're nobody without a piece of paper:” visibility, the state, and access to services among women who use drugs in Ukraine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Long, Tracy & Sque, Magi & Addington-Hall, Julia, 2008. "Conflict rationalisation: How family members cope with a diagnosis of brain stem death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 253-261, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:38:y:1994:i:2:p:351-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.