The causal impact of shared decision making on pain outcomes: Gender matters

This national US study determined the causal impact of shared decision making (SDM) on pain outcomes, including any overall pain and the subcategories of any acute pain and any chronic pain. We additionally examined whether the causal impact of SDM on overall pain is moderated by gender, race-ethnicity, clinician-patient racial-ethnic concordance, and clinician-patient gender concordance. We used national US data from the 2003–2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which were externally valid to the US national non-institutionalized population, employed a standard measure of shared decision making, and applied an internally-valid two-stage least squares approach that used the peer SDM behavior of similar clinicians as an instrument. The instrument was sufficiently strong and statistically uncorrelated with patient characteristics. We found a large impact of SDM on both female and male chronic pain outcomes, where the effect for females was approximately 50% larger than for males, with a 10 percentage point increase in SDM quality resulted fewer females experiencing chronic pain that interfered with everyday activities (−24.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.3, −6.4) than males (−16.5 percentage points; 95% CI: 32.9, −1.0). We estimated that a 10 percentage point national increase in the SDM index would thus result in 10.1 million fewer females and 5.7 million fewer males in the US experiencing chronic pain that interfered with their daily activities. Policy implications include both increasing the quality of SDM for all patients and educating male patients on the value of SDM.