IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v348y2024ics027795362400279x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“All hands on deck”: a qualitative study of safeguarding and the transition to telemedical abortion care in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Parsons, Jordan A.
  • Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic raised significant challenges for in-person healthcare provision, leading healthcare providers to embrace digital health like never before. Whilst changes were made as part of a public health response, many have now become permanent fixtures of the healthcare landscape, significantly altering the way care is provided not only for patients, but also for the healthcare professionals that provide care. In abortion care in England and Wales, previously stringent regulations on in-person care provision were relaxed to permit the use of telemedicine and self-administration of medications at home. These changes have since been made permanent. However, there remains opposition to remote abortion care pathways on the basis of safeguarding. Opponents argue that it is not feasible to effectively safeguard patients accessing abortion care remotely. We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with abortion care providers in England and Wales. Participants were asked about their views and experiences of the transition to remote care provision, with a particular focus on how they adapted their safeguarding practice. In this article, we present three themes that highlight the changing roles of healthcare professionals in abortion care: (1) a challenging backdrop and resulting apprehension, (2) adaptive practices, and (3) the continued importance of professional curiosity. Across all three themes, participants reflected significantly on how changes were made and what they experienced in the period of transition to telemedicine. In particular, they discussed the changing nature of their professional roles amidst digitalisation. Our findings provide a basis for reflection on the increasing introduction of digital approaches to healthcare provision, highlighting points for caution and emphasising the need to involve professionals in the transition process to ensure vital buy-in. Through this, we articulate two novel understandings of digitalisation: (1) the impact of speed-associated pressures on professional adaptation during digitalisation, and (2) off-proforma safeguarding through telemedicine as a form of invisible non-routine work.

Suggested Citation

  • Parsons, Jordan A. & Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe, 2024. "“All hands on deck”: a qualitative study of safeguarding and the transition to telemedical abortion care in England and Wales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:348:y:2024:i:c:s027795362400279x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362400279X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grossman, D.A. & Grindlay, K. & Buchacker, T. & Potter, J.E. & Schmertmann, C.P., 2013. "Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 73-78.
    2. Parsons, Jordan A & Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe, 2021. "2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UK," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 17-21.
    3. Ziebland, Sue & Hyde, Emma & Powell, John, 2021. "Power, paradox and pessimism: On the unintended consequences of digital health technologies in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske & Silvio Bicciato, 2022. "COVID-19 health policy evaluation: integrating health and economic perspectives with a data envelopment analysis approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1263-1285, November.
    2. Broussard, Kathleen, 2020. "The changing landscape of abortion care: Embodied experiences of structural stigma in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Issa, Helmi & Jaber, Jad & Lakkis, Hussein, 2024. "Navigating AI unpredictability: Exploring technostress in AI-powered healthcare systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Daniel Erku & Resham Khatri & Aklilu Endalamaw & Eskinder Wolka & Frehiwot Nigatu & Anteneh Zewdie & Yibeltal Assefa, 2023. "Digital Health Interventions to Improve Access to and Quality of Primary Health Care Services: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Ali Sunyaev & Daniel Fürstenau & Elizabeth Davidson, 2024. "Reimagining Digital Health," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 249-260, June.
    6. Kusta, Olsi & Bearman, Margaret & Gorur, Radhika & Risør, Torsten & Brodersen, John Brandt & Hoeyer, Klaus, 2024. "Speed, accuracy, and efficiency: The promises and practices of digitization in pathology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    7. Jill Barr-Walker & Ruvani T Jayaweera & Ana Maria Ramirez & Caitlin Gerdts, 2019. "Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:348:y:2024:i:c:s027795362400279x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.