IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v345y2024ics0277953624001072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiencing birth trauma: Individualism and isolation in postpartum

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson, Hyeyoung Oh

Abstract

Approximately 25–35% of individuals report experiencing a traumatic birth in the United States. Birth trauma has commonly been focused on the experience of labor and delivery itself, with definitions frequently pointing to specific clinical interventions, interactions with providers, and individual expectations during labor and delivery. These definitions however remain too limited, assuming that birth trauma has a discrete temporality—emerging in childbirth—and largely underestimate the social and structural factors that drive trauma. Drawing from interviews conducted between November 2021 and April 2023 with thirty cisgender women who have given birth at least once in the United States, I reveal how the postpartum period is a particularly vulnerable time for trauma emergence, even when absent of difficult delivery experiences. I reveal how social and structural factors in the postpartum period trigger trauma that remains largely invisible, leaving individuals isolated. I situate these women's experiences within the sociological scholarship on trauma, (bio)medicalization, neoliberalism, and risk, to reveal a critical need to expand definitions of, and approaches to, birth trauma.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson, Hyeyoung Oh, 2024. "Experiencing birth trauma: Individualism and isolation in postpartum," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:345:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624001072
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624001072
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Layne, Linda L., 2003. "Unhappy endings: a feminist reappraisal of the women's health movement from the vantage of pregnancy loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 1881-1891, May.
    2. Barker, Kristin K., 2011. "Listening to Lyrica: contested illnesses and pharmaceutical determinism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 833-842, September.
    3. Miller, Amy Chasteen & Shriver, Thomas E., 2012. "Women's childbirth preferences and practices in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 709-716.
    4. McCabe, Katharine, 2016. "Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neoliberal mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 177-184.
    5. Horon, I.L., 2005. "Underreporting of maternal deaths on death certificates and the magnitude of the problem of maternal mortality," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(3), pages 478-482.
    6. Barker, K. K., 1998. "A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1067-1076, October.
    7. Dubbin, Leslie A. & Chang, Jamie Suki & Shim, Janet K., 2013. "Cultural health capital and the interactional dynamics of patient-centered care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 113-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Outram, SM & Brown, JEH & Ackerman, SL, 2022. "The social value of genomic sequencing for disadvantaged families facing rare disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    2. Jovanovic, Maja, 2014. "Creating the ‘dis-ease’ of high cholesterol: A sociology of diagnosis reception analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 120-128.
    3. Manzer, Jamie L. & Bell, Ann V., 2022. "The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Silva, Jennifer M. & Durden, T. Elizabeth & Hirsch, Annemarie, 2023. "Erasing inequality: Examining discrepancies between electronic health records and patient narratives to uncover perceived stigma and dismissal in clinical encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    5. Fordyce, Lauren, 2013. "Accounting for fetal death: Vital statistics and the medicalization of pregnancy in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 124-131.
    6. Fenton, Anny T. & Elliott, Marc N. & Schwebel, David C. & Berkowitz, Zahava & Liddon, Nicole C. & Tortolero, Susan R. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Davies, Suzy L. & Schuster, Mark A., 2018. "Unequal interactions: Examining the role of patient-centered care in reducing inequitable diffusion of a medical innovation, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 238-248.
    7. Brian Walitt & Richard L Nahin & Robert S Katz & Martin J Bergman & Frederick Wolfe, 2015. "The Prevalence and Characteristics of Fibromyalgia in the 2012 National Health Interview Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Baji, Petra & Rubashkin, Nicholas & Szebik, Imre & Stoll, Kathrin & Vedam, Saraswathi, 2017. "Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: Are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 86-95.
    9. Wagner, Brandon G. & Cleland, Kelly & Batur, Pelin & Wu, Justine & Rothberg, Michael B., 2019. "Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Claire Edwards & Etaoine Howlett & Madeleine Akrich & Vololona Rabeharisoa, 2012. "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in France and Ireland: parents' groups' scientific and political framing of an unsettled condition," CSI Working Papers Series 024, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    11. Woolf, Becky & Vinson, Alexandra H., 2024. "Cultural health capital and patient partner recruitment into healthcare improvement work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    12. Hovav, April, 2020. "Cutting out the surrogate: Caesarean sections in the Mexican surrogacy industry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Reid, Alice & Garrett, Eilidh, 2018. "Medical provision and urban-rural differences in maternal mortality in late nineteenth century Scotland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 35-43.
    14. Angela Odero & Manon Pongy & Louis Chauvel & Bernard Voz & Elisabeth Spitz & Benoit Pétré & Michèle Baumann, 2020. "Core Values that Influence the Patient—Healthcare Professional Power Dynamic: Steering Interaction towards Partnership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Vololona Rabeharisoa, 2013. "Evidence-based activism: Patients’ organisations, users’ and activist’s groups in knowledge society," CSI Working Papers Series 033, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    16. van der Sijpt, Erica, 2010. "Marginal matters: Pregnancy loss as a social event," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1773-1779, November.
    17. Groenevelt, I.P.(Irene) & de Boer, M.L.(Marjolein), 2023. "Contesting misrecognition online: Experiences of epistemic in/justice by vloggers with contested illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    18. Fisher, Jill A. & Cottingham, Marci D. & Kalbaugh, Corey A., 2015. "Peering into the pharmaceutical “pipeline”: Investigational drugs, clinical trials, and industry priorities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 322-330.
    19. Benoit, Cecilia & Zadoroznyj, Maria & Hallgrimsdottir, Helga & Treloar, Adrienne & Taylor, Kara, 2010. "Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 475-481, August.
    20. Gage-Bouchard, Elizabeth A., 2017. "Social support, flexible resources, and health care navigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 111-118.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:345:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624001072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.