IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v327y2023ics0277953623002964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Avishai, Aya
  • Ribisl, Kurt M.
  • Sheeran, Paschal

Abstract

There is little research on public support for banning the sale and purchase of combustible cigarettes even though a ban is an essential step towards achieving the endgame for tobacco products.

Suggested Citation

  • Avishai, Aya & Ribisl, Kurt M. & Sheeran, Paschal, 2023. "Realizing the Tobacco Endgame: Understanding and mobilizing public support for banning combustible cigarette sales in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:327:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623002964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623002964
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Boeckmann & Daniel Kotz & Lion Shahab & Jamie Brown & Sabrina Kastaun, 2018. "German Public Support for Tobacco Control Policy Measures: Results from the German Study on Tobacco Use (DEBRA), a Representative National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Barberá, Pablo & Casas, Andreu & Nagler, Jonathan & Egan, Patrick J. & Bonneau, Richard & Jost, John T. & Tucker, Joshua A., 2019. "Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(4), pages 883-901, November.
    3. Connolly, G.N. & Behm, I. & Healton, C.G. & Alpert, H.R., 2012. "Public attitudes regarding banning of cigarettes and regulation of nicotine," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1-2.
    4. Allison M. Schmidt & Sarah D. Kowitt & Allison E. Myers & Adam O. Goldstein, 2018. "Attitudes towards Potential New Tobacco Control Regulations among U.S. Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Rose, S.W. & Emery, S.L. & Ennett, S. & Reyes, H.L.M. & Scott, J.C. & Ribisl, K.M., 2015. "Public support for family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point-of-sale provisions: Results of a national study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(10), pages 60-67.
    6. Aaron Deslatte, 2020. "To shop or shelter? Issue framing effects and social-distancing preferences in the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    7. Patricia A McDaniel & Ruth E Malone, 2020. "Tobacco industry and public health responses to state and local efforts to end tobacco sales from 1969-2020," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    8. repec:cup:apsrev:v:113:y:2019:i:04:p:883-901_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Pratibha Nayak & Terry F. Pechacek & Paul Slovic & Michael P. Eriksen, 2017. "Regretting Ever Starting to Smoke: Results from a 2014 National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allison M. Schmidt & Sarah D. Kowitt & Allison E. Myers & Adam O. Goldstein, 2018. "Attitudes towards Potential New Tobacco Control Regulations among U.S. Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Gera E. Nagelhout & Lucy Popova & Mirte A. G. Kuipers, 2018. "Why Are New Tobacco Control Interventions Needed?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-3, April.
    3. Jetter, Michael & Molina, Teresa, 2022. "Persuasive agenda-setting: Rodrigo Duterte’s inauguration speech and drugs in the Philippines," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Lee, Yuan Ting & Callaghan, Max & Jankin, Slava & Minx, Jan C., 2022. "The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Costas Milas & Theodore Panagiotidis & Theologos Dergiades, 2021. "Does It Matter Where You Search? Twitter versus Traditional News Media," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 53(7), pages 1757-1795, October.
    6. Qi Wang & Mengdi Liu & Jintao Xu & Bing Zhang, 2023. "Blow the Lid Off: Public Complaints, Bargaining Power, and Government Responsiveness on Social Media," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 133-166, May.
    7. Schunk, Daniel & Wagner, Valentin, 2021. "What determines the willingness to sanction violations of newly introduced social norms: Personality traits or economic preferences? evidence from the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Pierluigi Conzo & Andrea Gallice & Juan S. Morales & Margaret Samahita & Laura K. Taylor, 2021. "Can Hearts Change Minds? Social media Endorsements and Policy Preferences," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 641, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    9. Nurhayani Saragih & Sriwahyuning Astuti & Novi Erlita & Suraya Mansur & Santa Lorita Simamora & Endri Endri, 2024. "Netizens’ Discussions on Twitter Concerning Floods and Presidential Candidates," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 263-276, September.
    10. Mohamed Mekhemar & Jonas Conrad & Sameh Attia & Christof Dörfer, 2020. "Oral Health Attitudes among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Sarah D Kowitt & Seth M Noar & Leah M Ranney & Adam O Goldstein, 2017. "Public attitudes toward larger cigarette pack warnings: Results from a nationally representative U.S. sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Yuen, Vera W.H., 2023. "The efficacy of health experts’ communication in inducing support for COVID-19 measures and effect on trustworthiness: A survey in Hong Kong," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    13. Claire L Adida & Adeline Lo & Melina R Platas, 2019. "Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Syon P. Bhanot & Daniel J. Hopkins, 2020. "Partisan polarization and resistance to elite messages: Results from survey experiments on social distancing," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).
    15. Oscar Calvo-Gonz'alez & Axel Eizmendi & Germ'an Reyes, 2022. "The Shifting Attention of Political Leaders: Evidence from Two Centuries of Presidential Speeches," Papers 2209.00540, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    16. Martin Mlinarić & Sabrina Kastaun & Daniel Kotz, 2022. "Exposure to Tobacco Smoking in Vehicles, Indoor, and Outdoor Settings in Germany: Prevalence and Associated Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Barbara Gomez‐Aguinaga, 2021. "One Group, Two Worlds? Latino Perceptions of Policy Salience Among Mainstream and Spanish‐Language News Consumers," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 238-258, January.
    18. Francesco Giavazzi & Felix Iglhaut & Giacomo Lemoli & Gaia Rubera, 2020. "Terrorist Attacks, Cultural Incidents and the Vote for Radical Parties: Analyzing Text from Twitter," NBER Working Papers 26825, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Andrea Soong & Ana Navas-Acien & Yuanjie Pang & Maria Jose Lopez & Esther Garcia-Esquinas & Frances A. Stillman, 2016. "A Cross-Sectional Study of Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship in Airports across Europe and the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-9, September.
    20. Antoine Genest-Grégoire & Étienne Charbonneau & Daniel E. Bromberg, 2018. "The Sustainability Assumption in Performance Management Reforms: Revisiting the Patterns of Implementation," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 525-542, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:327:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623002964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.