IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v324y2023ics0277953623001910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultures of antibiotic prescribing in medical intensive care

Author

Listed:
  • Rynkiewich, Katharina
  • Gole, Sarin
  • Won, Sarah
  • Schwartz, David N.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to present a challenge to international healthcare systems and structures of public health. The focus on optimizing antibiotic prescribing in human populations has challenged healthcare systems charged with making responsible their physician-prescribers. In the United States, physicians in almost every specialty and role use antibiotics as part of their therapeutic armamentariums. In United States hospitals, most patients are administered antibiotics during their stay. Therefore, antibiotic prescribing and utilization is a commonly accepted part of medical practice. In this paper, we utilize social science work on antibiotic prescribing to examine a critical space of care in United States hospital settings. From March to August 2018, we used ethnographic methods to study hospital-based medical intensive care unit physicians at the offices and hospital floors they frequent in two urban United States teaching hospitals. We focused on eliciting the interactions and discussions surrounding antibiotic decision-making that are uniquely influenced by the context of medical intensive care units. We argue that antibiotic use in the medical intensive care units under study was shaped by urgency, hierarchy, and uncertainty representative of the medical intensive care unit's role within the larger hospital system. We conclude that by studying the culture of antibiotic prescribing in medical intensive care units, we can see more clearly both the vulnerability of the looming antimicrobial resistance crisis and by contrast the perceived insignificance of stewarding antibiotic use when considered alongside the fragility of life amidst acute medical concerns regularly experienced in the unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Rynkiewich, Katharina & Gole, Sarin & Won, Sarah & Schwartz, David N., 2023. "Cultures of antibiotic prescribing in medical intensive care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:324:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623001910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623001910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luisa Toro-Alzate & Karlijn Hofstraat & Daniel H. de Vries, 2021. "The Pandemic beyond the Pandemic: A Scoping Review on the Social Relationships between COVID-19 and Antimicrobial Resistance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Stivers, Tanya, 2005. "Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: delivery formats and implications for parent resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 949-964, March.
    3. Marc Mendelson & Manica Balasegaram & Tim Jinks & Céline Pulcini & Mike Sharland, 2017. "Antibiotic resistance has a language problem," Nature, Nature, vol. 545(7652), pages 23-25, May.
    4. Broom, Alex & Broom, Jennifer & Kirby, Emma, 2014. "Cultures of resistance? A Bourdieusian analysis of doctors' antibiotic prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 81-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sue Walker, 2019. "Effective antimicrobial resistance communication: the role of information design," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Gautham, Meenakshi & Spicer, Neil & Chatterjee, Soumyadip & Goodman, Catherine, 2021. "What are the challenges for antibiotic stewardship at the community level? An analysis of the drivers of antibiotic provision by informal healthcare providers in rural India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Tate, Alexandra, 2020. "Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Lhermie, Guillaume & Wernli, Didier & Jørgensen, Peter Søgaard & Kenkel, Donald & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Tauer, Loren William & Gröhn, Yrjo Tapio, 2019. "Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Broom, Alex & Kenny, Katherine & Kirby, Emma & Davis, Mark & Dodds, Susan & Post, Jeffrey & Broom, Jennifer, 2021. "The modern hospital executive, micro improvements, and the rise of antimicrobial resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Aaron Martin & Timothy B Gravelle & Erik Baekkeskov & Jenny Lewis & Yoshi Kashima, 2019. "Enlisting the support of trusted sources to tackle policy problems: The case of antimicrobial resistance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-9, March.
    7. Broom, Alex & Broom, Jennifer & Kirby, Emma & Scambler, Graham, 2015. "The path of least resistance? Jurisdictions, responsibility and professional asymmetries in pharmacists' accounts of antibiotic decisions in hospitals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 95-103.
    8. Nutcha Charoenboon & Marco J. Haenssgen & Penporn Warapikuptanun & Thipphaphone Xayavong & Yuzana Khine Zaw, 2019. "Translating antimicrobial resistance: a case study of context and consequences of antibiotic-related communication in three northern Thai villages," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Toerien, Merran, 2021. "When do patients exercise their right to refuse treatment? A conversation analytic study of decision-making trajectories in UK neurology outpatient consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    10. Broom, Alex & Doron, Assa, 2022. "Resistant bugs, porous borders and ecologies of care in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Bergen, Clara & McCabe, Rose, 2021. "Negative stance towards treatment in psychosocial assessments: The role of personalised recommendations in promoting acceptance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    12. Hudak, Pamela L. & Clark, Shannon J. & Raymond, Geoffrey, 2011. "How surgeons design treatment recommendations in orthopaedic surgery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1028-1036.
    13. Wang, Sophie Y. & Cantarelli, Paola & Groene, Oliver & Stargardt, Tom & Belle, Nicola, 2023. "Patient expectations do matter - Experimental evidence on antibiotic prescribing decisions among hospital-based physicians," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 11-17.
    14. Clare I. R. Chandler, 2019. "Current accounts of antimicrobial resistance: stabilisation, individualisation and antibiotics as infrastructure," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Stivers, Tanya & Timmermans, Stefan, 2021. "Arriving at no: Patient pressure to prescribe antibiotics and physicians’ responses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    16. Kamenshchikova, A. & Wolffs, P.F.G. & Hoebe, C.J. & Penders, J. & Horstman, K., 2018. "Complex narratives of health, stigma and control: Antimicrobial resistance screening among non-hospitalized refugees," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 43-49.
    17. White, Anne Elizabeth Clark, 2020. "When and how do surgeons initiate noticings of additional concerns?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    18. Carlsson, Fredrik & Jacobsson, Gunnar & Lampi, Elina & Rönnestrand, Björn, 2021. "Peers, policy, and attitudes as drivers of antibiotic prescribing," Working Papers in Economics 803, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    19. Wang, Nan Christine & Liu, Yuetong, 2021. "Going shopping or consulting in medical visits: Caregivers’ roles in pediatric antibiotic prescribing in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    20. Armstrong, Natalie & Hilton, Paul, 2014. "Doing diagnosis: Whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 208-214.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:324:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623001910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.