IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v306y2022ics0277953622004142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of an evacuation shelter program for people with access and functional needs in Monroe County, Florida during Hurricane Irma

Author

Listed:
  • Holmes, Tisha Joseph
  • Williams, Patrice C.
  • Wong, Sandy
  • Smith, Kathryn
  • Bandzuh, John T.
  • Uejio, Christopher K.

Abstract

This case study presents an evaluation framework to assess the facilitating and constraining factors that influenced the emergency response, operation, and management of a Special Needs Shelter Program in Monroe County, Florida during Hurricane Irma in 2017. A qualitative analysis of key documents and discussions with agencies directly involved in the Monroe County Special Needs Shelter Program was used to assess four major emergency response processes: notifications and communications, evacuation and transportation, sheltering, and interagency coordination. A critical cross-cutting theme emerged, which was a lack of a common definition for populations with “special needs” across different agencies resulting in uncertainties about who should be admitted to the Special Needs Shelter and have access to their services. We generate public health and emergency management lessons to inform future adaptation, preparedness, and response plans to extreme weather events for populations with access and functional needs in Monroe County and Florida's coastal communities more broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Holmes, Tisha Joseph & Williams, Patrice C. & Wong, Sandy & Smith, Kathryn & Bandzuh, John T. & Uejio, Christopher K., 2022. "Assessment of an evacuation shelter program for people with access and functional needs in Monroe County, Florida during Hurricane Irma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:306:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622004142
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622004142
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303882_4 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Karagiannis Georgios Marios & Synolakis Costas, 2017. "Twenty Challenges in Incident Planning," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Leider, J.P. & Debruin, D. & Reynolds, N. & Koch, A. & Seaberg, J., 2017. "Ethical guidance for disaster response, specifically around crisis standards of care: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(9), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryam Maleki & Abbas Mardani & Mojtaba Vaismoradi, 2021. "Insecure Employment Contracts during the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Need for Participation in Policy Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Brooke Fisher Liu & Duli Shi & JungKyu Rhys Lim & Khairul Islam & America L. Edwards & Matthew Seeger, 2022. "When Crises Hit Home: How U.S. Higher Education Leaders Navigate Values During Uncertain Times," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 353-368, August.
    3. Brielle Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Emergency and Disaster Management, Preparedness, and Planning (EDMPP) and the ‘Social’: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-50, October.
    4. Guo Li & Jinfeng Wang & Xin Wang, 2023. "Construction and Path of Urban Public Safety Governance and Crisis Management Optimization Model Integrating Artificial Intelligence Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Krzysztof Goniewicz & Mariusz Goniewicz & Anna Włoszczak-Szubzda & Dorota Lasota & Frederick M. Burkle & Marta Borowska-Stefańska & Szymon Wiśniewski & Amir Khorram-Manesh, 2022. "The Moral, Ethical, Personal, and Professional Challenges Faced by Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:306:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622004142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.