IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v291y2021ics027795362030647x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomedicalization of end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults - Malleable and senescent bodies

Author

Listed:
  • Carter, Celina
  • Mohammed, Shan
  • Upshur, Ross
  • Kontos, Pia

Abstract

The common practice of delaying and/or avoiding end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults is an important clinical issue. Most research investigating this practice focuses on clinician training and developing conversation skills. Little is known about the socio-political factors shaping the phenomenon of end-of-life conversations between clinicians and medically frail older patients. Using the critical lens of biomedicalization we consider how two dominant discourses, successful aging and frailty, and subsequent constructions of bodies as malleable or senescent, shape patient subjectivities and influence normative expectations about appropriate healthcare conversations and the consumption of biomedicine for medically frail adults. We highlight the uneven ways medically frail older adults are clinically positioned as successful or frail agers and briefly discuss how gender, class, and race may impact this tension and ambiguity. We conclude by arguing that end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults is constrained by the pervasiveness of the successful aging discourse and the tendency within medical institutions to construct older bodies as malleable and in need of medical intervention to promote health and longevity.

Suggested Citation

  • Carter, Celina & Mohammed, Shan & Upshur, Ross & Kontos, Pia, 2021. "Biomedicalization of end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults - Malleable and senescent bodies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:291:y:2021:i:c:s027795362030647x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362030647X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferlie, Ewan & Mcgivern, Gerry & FitzGerald, Louise, 2012. "A new mode of organizing in health care? Governmentality and managed networks in cancer services in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 340-347.
    2. Sharon R. Kaufman & Janet K. Shim & Ann J. Russ, 2006. "Old Age, Life Extension, and the Character of Medical Choice," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 61(4), pages 175-184.
    3. Zivkovic, Tanya, 2018. "Forecasting and foreclosing futures: The temporal dissonance of advance care directives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 16-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen Gaast & Jan Eelco Jansma & Sigrid Wertheim-Heck, 2023. "Between ambitions and actions: how citizens navigate the entrepreneurial process of co-producing sustainable urban food futures," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1287-1302, September.
    2. Hedlund, M. & Landstad, B.J. & Tritter, J.Q., 2019. "The disciplining of self-help: Doing self-help the Norwegian way," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 34-41.
    3. Lori Harwood & Alexander M Clark, 2014. "Dialysis modality decision‐making for older adults with chronic kidney disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3378-3390, December.
    4. Kaufman, Sharon R. & Mueller, Paul S. & Ottenberg, Abigale L. & Koenig, Barbara A., 2011. "Ironic technology: Old age and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in US health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 6-14, January.
    5. McGivern, Gerry & Nzinga, Jacinta & English, Mike, 2017. "‘Pastoral practices’ for quality improvement in a Kenyan clinical network," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 115-122.
    6. Zivkovic, Tanya, 2021. "About face: Relationalities of ageing and dying in Chinese migrant families," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    7. Marc Nikitin & Jean-Baptiste Capgras & Dragos Zelinschi, 2017. "Dynamiques de la gouvernementalité : concurrence et calcul des coûts dans le système de santé français," Post-Print hal-01907396, HAL.
    8. Walsh, Mike & Kittler, Markus G. & Mahal, Dawn, 2018. "Towards a new paradigm of healthcare: Addressing challenges to professional identities through Community Operational Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1125-1133.
    9. Federica Segato & Cristina Masella, 2017. "Integrated care in action: opening the “black box” of implementation," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 50-71, January.
    10. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Hilberg, Eva & Waring, Justin, 2018. "Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 146-153.
    11. Currie, Graeme & Dingwall, Robert & Kitchener, Martin & Waring, Justin, 2012. "Let’s dance: Organization studies, medical sociology and health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 273-280.
    12. Martin, Graham P. & Leslie, Myles & Minion, Joel & Willars, Janet & Dixon-Woods, Mary, 2013. "Between surveillance and subjectification: Professionals and the governance of quality and patient safety in English hospitals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 80-88.
    13. Burson, Randall C. & Familusi, Olivia O. & Clapp, Justin T., 2022. "Imagining the ‘structural’ in medical education and practice in the United States: A curricular investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    14. Duberstein, Paul R. & Hoerger, Michael & Norton, Sally A. & Mohile, Supriya & Dahlberg, Britt & Hyatt, Erica Goldblatt & Epstein, Ronald M. & Wittink, Marsha N., 2023. "The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:291:y:2021:i:c:s027795362030647x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.