IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v281y2021ics0277953621004081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Providing universal access to modern contraceptive methods: An extended cost-effectiveness analysis of meeting the demand for modern contraception in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Enden, M.R.
  • Tolla, M.T.
  • Norheim, O.F.

Abstract

Despite recent advances in access to and use of modern contraception in Ethiopia, further improvement is needed, particularly among poorer women. This extended cost-effectiveness analysis investigated the health outcomes, their distribution, and financial risk protection associated with meeting the demand for modern contraception for all Ethiopian women. We developed five Markov models with wealth quintile–specific input data to investigate the effects of meeting this demand and followed a hypothetical cohort of 1,252,000 women through their reproductive lives from ages 15–49 years. The health outcomes are reported in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and in intermediate health outcomes, such as the total number of induced abortions, unintended pregnancies, and pregnancy-related deaths averted. The economic effect of meeting the demand for modern contraception was assessed by estimating the financial risk protection benefits in terms of averted out-of-pocket payments and the reduction in the number of cases of catastrophic health expenditure by quintile. Meeting the demand for modern contraception was deemed highly cost effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $96.60/QALY gained per woman. A total of 676,300 QALYs were gained, and approximately 1,900,000 unintended pregnancies, 250,000 induced abortions, and 9000 pregnancy-related deaths were averted over the 35-year period. Most of these gains were achieved among low-income groups. When the demand for modern contraception was met, almost 40,000 cases of catastrophic health expenditure were averted in the poorest quintile. The total governmental cost was higher in all quintiles when the demand for modern contraception was met compared to the baseline scenario, with the largest percentage increase in governmental spending in the poorest quintiles. Meeting the demand for modern contraception fulfills the priority-setting criteria established by the Ethiopian Ministry of Health and makes the Ethiopian health care system more equitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Enden, M.R. & Tolla, M.T. & Norheim, O.F., 2021. "Providing universal access to modern contraceptive methods: An extended cost-effectiveness analysis of meeting the demand for modern contraception in Ethiopia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:281:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621004081
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621004081
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neily Zakiyah & A. D. I. Asselt & D. Setiawan & Q. Cao & F. Roijmans & M. J. Postma, 2019. "Cost-Effectiveness of Scaling Up Modern Family Planning Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Economic Modeling Analysis in Indonesia and Uganda," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 65-76, February.
    2. Neily Zakiyah & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Frank Roijmans & Maarten J Postma, 2016. "Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Joseph B Babigumira & Andy Stergachis & David L Veenstra & Jacqueline S Gardner & Joseph Ngonzi & Peter Mukasa-Kivunike & Louis P Garrison, 2012. "Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Access to Modern Contraceptives in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Stéphane Verguet & Jane J. Kim & Dean T. Jamison, 2016. "Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health Policy Assessment: A Tutorial," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(9), pages 913-923, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon P S Kibira & Christine Muhumuza & Justine N Bukenya & Lynn M Atuyambe, 2015. "“I Spent a Full Month Bleeding, I Thought I Was Going to Die…” A Qualitative Study of Experiences of Women Using Modern Contraception in Wakiso District, Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Andrew J. Mirelman & Miqdad Asaria & Bryony Dawkins & Susan Griffin & Richard Cookson & Peter Berman, 2020. "Fairer Decisions, Better Health for All: Health Equity and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Paul Revill & Marc Suhrcke & Rodrigo Moreno-Serra & Mark Sculpher (ed.), Global Health Economics Shaping Health Policy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, chapter 4, pages 99-132, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Neily Zakiyah & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Frank Roijmans & Maarten J Postma, 2016. "Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Dirk Steijger & Chandrima Chatterjee & Wim Groot & Milena Pavlova, 2022. "Challenges and Limitations in Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Grant Miller & Aureo de Paula & Christine Valente, 2020. "Subjective Expectations and Demand for Contraception," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 20/724, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    6. Tigist F. Menkir & Christl A. Donnelly, 2022. "The impact of repeated rapid test strategies on the effectiveness of at-home antiviral treatments for SARS-CoV-2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Camila Perera & Shivit Bakrania & Alessandra Ipince & Zahrah Nesbitt‐Ahmed & Oluwaseun Obasola & Dominic Richardson & Jorinde Van de Scheur & Ruichuan Yu, 2022. "Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    8. Katherine T. Lofgren & David A. Watkins & Solomon T. Memirie & Joshua A. Salomon & Stéphane Verguet, 2021. "Balancing health and financial protection in health benefit package design," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3236-3247, December.
    9. Jan-Walter De Neve & Rija L Andriantavison & Kevin Croke & Johannes Krisam & Voahirana H Rajoela & Rary A Rakotoarivony & Valérie Rambeloson & Linda Schultz & Jumana Qamruddin & Stéphane Verguet, 2018. "Health, financial, and education gains of investing in preventive chemotherapy for schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiases, and lymphatic filariasis in Madagascar: A modeling study," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    10. James Love-Koh & Susan Griffin & Edward Kataika & Paul Revill & Sibusiso Sibandze & Simon Walker, 2019. "Incorporating concerns for equity into health resource allocation. A guide for practitioners," Working Papers 160cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    11. Dukhanin, Vadim & Searle, Alexandra & Zwerling, Alice & Dowdy, David W. & Taylor, Holly A. & Merritt, Maria W., 2018. "Integrating social justice concerns into economic evaluation for healthcare and public health: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 27-35.
    12. Rui Miao & Xiaohao Xiang & Qi Wu & Zhibin Jiang, 2020. "Evaluation method of medical service system based on DEMATEL and the information entropy: A case study of hypertension diagnosis and treatment in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Özlem Karsu & Alec Morton, 2021. "Trading off health and financial protection benefits with multiobjective optimization," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 55-69, January.
    14. Admassu N. Lamu & Ole F. Norheim & Fredrik A. Gregersen & Mathias Barra, 2021. "Cycle‐network expansion plan in Oslo: Modeling cost‐effectiveness analysis and health equity impact," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3220-3235, December.
    15. Thiboonboon, Kittiphong & Lourenco, Richard De Abreu & Cronin, Paula & Khoo, Terence & Goodall, Stephen, 2024. "Economic Evaluations of Obesity-Targeted Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Taxes–A Review to Identify Methodological Issues," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. Solomon J Lubinga & Esther C Atukunda & George Wasswa-Ssalongo & Joseph B Babigumira, 2015. "Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Prenatal Distribution of Misoprostol for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Demir, Eren & Yakutcan, Usame & Page, Stephen, 2024. "Using simulation modelling to transform hospital planning and management to address health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    18. World Bank Group, 2018. "An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tobacco Price Increases in the Kyrgyz Republic," World Bank Publications - Reports 29819, The World Bank Group.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:281:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621004081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.