IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v280y2021ics0277953621003658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

We've got what the NHS ultimately intended for us: Experiences of community engagement in rural primary care services change

Author

Listed:
  • Munoz, Sarah-Anne
  • Bradley, Sara

Abstract

Policy promotes service user engagement in health services design and delivery. Various tools exist to support the engagement of citizens within health services design. We consider community engagement within the context of primary care delivery in remote and rural areas of Scotland. We present findings from three years of qualitative work with community members and healthcare professionals within five different remote and rural areas, undergoing primary care service changes. 364 interviews were carried out with community members and healthcare professionals on their experiences of, and feelings towards, the services changes. A key theme to emerge from our thematic analysis of the qualitative data is experiences of community engagement. In this paper we present our analysis of this theme. We identify different types of community engagement discourse within community and healthcare professional interviews. We illustrate these themes and, through consideration of five case study areas, demonstrate how these discourses can co-exist within the same service change process. The paper presents our sub-themes on community engagement relating to discourses of inclusion and exclusion; the role of the General Practitioner (GP); conceptualisations of the organisational role of the NHS; discourses of fear and, finally, community members understandings of what it means to be active “agents of change” (or not) within health services redesign. We argue that context is as important as method when it comes to facilitating a positive community engagement experience for citizens. Our findings have relevance to the emerging social science literature on citizen experience of public sector community engagement activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Munoz, Sarah-Anne & Bradley, Sara, 2021. "We've got what the NHS ultimately intended for us: Experiences of community engagement in rural primary care services change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:280:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621003658
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621003658
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farmer, Jane & Currie, Margaret & Kenny, Amanda & Munoz, Sarah-Anne, 2015. "An exploration of the longer-term impacts of community participation in rural health services design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Adeyemi Fakere & Clement Oluwole Folorunso & Olatunde Arayela & Felix Kayode Omole, 2020. "Strategic framework for resident’s participation in housing provision in Akure, Southwest Nigeria," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 137-160, October.
    2. Yang Fu & Weihong Ma, 2020. "Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:280:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621003658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.