IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i9p987-994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies?

Author

Listed:
  • Coulter, Angela
  • McPherson, Klim
  • Vessey, Martin

Abstract

Hysterectomy is performed much less frequently in Britain than in North America, Australia and some European countries. Various theories have been advanced to explain this lower rate of surgery. These include: fewer health care resources (hospital beds, surgeons); much less fee-for-service medicine; differences in the attitudes of surgeons; differences in health care organisation, in particular the gatekeeping role of general practitioners; and differences in patients' expectations. This paper reviews the evidence on sources of variation and examines the extent to which hysterectomy rates vary between countries, and between small areas and social groups within Britain. Following an examination of national trends, evidence is presented from studies carried out in the Oxford region to illustrate the extent of variation in the rate at which hysterectomy is carried out and to explore the possible reasons for the differences. The article considers the health policy implications of an apparent increase in demand for hysterectomy and argues the case for a thorough evaluation of the impact of this operation on quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Coulter, Angela & McPherson, Klim & Vessey, Martin, 1988. "Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 987-994, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:9:p:987-994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90289-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santer, Miriam & Wyke, Sally & Warner, Pam, 2008. "Women's management of menstrual symptoms: Findings from a postal survey and qualitative interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 276-288, January.
    2. Peter West, 1998. "Managed Care - A Model for the UK?," Monograph 000440, Office of Health Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:9:p:987-994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.