IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v279y2021ics027795362100366x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Values, skills, and decision-making: A cultural sociological approach to explaining diagnostic disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Mei, Xiao
  • Tu, Jiong

Abstract

This paper provides an analytical framework for explaining the practice of diagnostic disclosure by drawing on theoretical developments regarding the question of “culture in action.” Based on ethnographic and interview data collected from fieldwork at a major cancer hospital in China from 2015 to 2019, this paper explains how doctors and family members make decisions about diagnostic disclosure. We argue that it is important to understand the practice of diagnostic disclosure as motivated by the actors' values on the one hand, and constrained and enabled by the actors’ skills on the other hand. It is also necessary to distinguish between personal and public values, as well as medical and interpersonal skills. Based on these distinctions, we will be better equipped to explain why diagnostic disclosure has encountered difficulties in family-centered societies, such as China.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei, Xiao & Tu, Jiong, 2021. "Values, skills, and decision-making: A cultural sociological approach to explaining diagnostic disclosure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:279:y:2021:i:c:s027795362100366x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362100366X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Alex Jingwei & Qian, Jiwei, 2016. "Explaining medical disputes in Chinese public hospitals: the doctor–patient relationship and its implications for health policy reforms," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(4), pages 359-378, October.
    2. Elwyn, Todd S. & D. Fetters, Michael & Gorenflo, Daniel W. & Tsukasa Tsuda, 1998. "Cancer disclosure in Japan: Historical comparisons, current practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1151-1163, May.
    3. Gordon, Deborah R. & Paci, Eugenio, 1997. "Disclosure practices and cultural narratives: Understanding concealment and silence around cancer in Tuscany, Italy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1433-1452, May.
    4. Jutel, Annemarie, 2016. "Truth and lies: Disclosure and the power of diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 92-98.
    5. Harris, Julian J. & Shao, John & Sugarman, Jeremy, 2003. "Disclosure of cancer diagnosis and prognosis in Northern Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 905-913, March.
    6. Miyaji, Naoko T., 1993. "The power of compassion: Truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 249-264, February.
    7. Hamadeh, Ghassan N. & Adib, Salim M., 1998. "Cancer truth disclosure by Lebanese doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1289-1294, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongxu Li & Min Su & Xi Guo & Weile Zhang & Tianjiao Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Medical Choice on Health Costs of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Chronic Disease: Based on Principal-Agent Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Xin Zhao & Xiaoxue Li & Benno Torgler & Uwe Dulleck, 2021. "Patient violence, physicians treatment decisions, and patient welfare: Evidence from China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1461-1479, June.
    3. Alex Jingwei He & Liang Ma, 2020. "Corporate policy entrepreneurship and cross‐boundary strategies: How a private corporation champions mobile healthcare payment innovation in China?," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 76-86, February.
    4. Zhan Wang & Niying Li & Mengsi Jiang & Keith Dear & Chee-Ruey Hsieh, 2017. "Records of medical malpractice litigation: A potential indicator of healthcare quality in China," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-144, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Yu, Wantao & Zhao, Gen & Liu, Qi & Song, Yongtao, 2021. "Role of big data analytics capability in developing integrated hospital supply chains and operational flexibility: An organizational information processing theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Sinclair, Craig & Smith, Jessica & Toussaint, Yann & Auret, Kirsten, 2014. "Discussing dying in the diaspora: Attitudes towards advance care planning among first generation Dutch and Italian migrants in rural Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-93.
    7. Jiwei Qian & Alex Jingwei He, 2018. "The Bonus Scheme, Motivation Crowding-out and Quality of the Doctor-Patient Encounters in Chinese Public Hospitals," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 143-158, June.
    8. Li Luo & Ying Zhou & Bernard T. Han & Jialing Li, 2019. "An optimization model to determine appointment scheduling window for an outpatient clinic with patient no-shows," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 68-84, March.
    9. Liu, Junqiang & Zhou, Hui & Liu, Lingrui & Wang, Chunxiao, 2020. "The weakness of the strong: Examining the squeaky-wheel effect of hospital violence in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    10. Zhao, Chunjuan & Ma, Wen, 2020. "Patient resistance towards clinicians’ diagnostic test-taking advice and its management in Chinese outpatient clinic interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Bianca Hanganu & Irina Smaranda Manoilescu & Cristian Paparau & Laura Gheuca-Solovastru & Camelia Liana Buhas & Andreea Silvana Szalontay & Beatrice Gabriela Ioan, 2022. "Why Are Patients Unhappy with Their Healthcare? A Romanian Physicians’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Alex Jingwei He & Yumeng Fan & Rui Su, 2022. "Seeking policy solutions in a complex system: experimentalist governance in China’s healthcare reform," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 755-776, December.
    13. Daker-White, Gavin & Rogers, Anne & Kennedy, Anne & Blakeman, Thomas & Blickem, Christian & Chew-Graham, Carolyn, 2015. "Non-disclosure of chronic kidney disease in primary care and the limits of instrumental rationality in chronic illness self-management," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 31-39.
    14. Joyce, Kelly & Jeske, Melanie, 2020. "Using autoimmune strategically: Diagnostic lumping, splitting, and the experience of illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Ying Mao & Wei Ning & Ning Zhang & Tao Xie & Jinnan Liu & Yongbo Lu & Bin Zhu, 2021. "The Therapeutic Relationship in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Malambo, Nomthandazo, 2021. "“Not from home”: Cancer screening avoidance and the safety of distance in Eswatini," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    17. Hagihara, Akihito & Tarumi, Kimio, 2007. "Association between physicians' communicative behaviors and judges' decisions in lawsuits on negligent care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 213-222, October.
    18. Stacey, Clare L. & Pai, Manacy & Novisky, Meghan A. & Radwany, Steven M., 2019. "Revisiting ‘awareness contexts’ in the 21st century hospital: How fragmented and specialized care shape patients' Awareness of Dying," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 212-218.
    19. Kirby, Emma & Broom, Alex & MacArtney, John & Lewis, Sophie & Good, Phillip, 2021. "Hopeful dying? The meanings and practice of hope in palliative care family meetings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    20. Engman, Athena, 2019. "Embodiment and the foundation of biographical disruption," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 120-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:279:y:2021:i:c:s027795362100366x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.