IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v235y2019ic9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: Evidence from dyadic analysis and association with quality of dyadic communication

Author

Listed:
  • Petrocchi, S.
  • Iannello, P.
  • Lecciso, F.
  • Levante, A.
  • Antonietti, A.
  • Schulz, P.J.

Abstract

Rationale. Although they form a dyadic relationship, doctor's and patient's levels of trust in the other have usually been investigated separately. As members of dyadic relationships, they influence each other's behaviors and are interdependent because they share a past history and eventually a common future. Objectives. The aim of this paper was to examine the composition of trust in doctor-patients relationship and estimate its association with quality of doctor's communication. One-With-Many analyses (OWM) were used to examine the composition of trust variance into “doctor and patient effects”, “relationship effects”, and “reciprocity effects,” taking into account the interdependence of the data. Method. Twelve General Practitioners (GPs; Mage = 54.16, SD = 12.28, 8 men) and 189 of their patients (Mage = 47.48, SD = 9.88, 62% women) took part in the study. GPs and their patients completed postconsultation questionnaires on trust and quality of communication. Results. The findings revealed that “doctor” and “patient” effects were significant. However, the most important part of the variance was attributable to the relationship and reciprocity effects, meaning that if a doctor reported high trust in a particular patient, then the patient reported a similarly high level of trust. Higher quality of communication was positively associated to those relationship effects of trust. Conclusions. Our study stresses the importance to investigate trust in doctor-patients relationship as a dyadic and interdependent phenomenon applying appropriate methodological design and analysis. Convergence between doctor's and patients' perceptions of their relationship may enhance trust more than conventional intervention and may ultimately contribute to better health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Petrocchi, S. & Iannello, P. & Lecciso, F. & Levante, A. & Antonietti, A. & Schulz, P.J., 2019. "Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: Evidence from dyadic analysis and association with quality of dyadic communication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:235:y:2019:i:c:9
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619303764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janina Kulińska & Łukasz Rypicz & Katarzyna Zatońska, 2022. "The Impact of Effective Communication on Perceptions of Patient Safety—A Prospective Study in Selected Polish Hospitals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Annalisa Levante & Serena Petrocchi & Federica Bianco & Ilaria Castelli & Flavia Lecciso, 2023. "Teachers during the COVID-19 Era: The Mediation Role Played by Mentalizing Ability on the Relationship between Depressive Symptoms, Anxious Trait, and Job Burnout," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Bagnis, Arianna & Caffo, Ernesto & Cipolli, Carlo & De Palma, Alessandra & Farina, Gabriele & Mattarozzi, Katia, 2020. "Judging health care priority in emergency situations: Patient facial appearance matters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Xinzhi Song & Nan Jiang & Honghe Li & Ning Ding & Deliang Wen, 2021. "Medical professionalism research characteristics and hotspots: a 10-year bibliometric analysis of publications from 2010 to 2019," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 8009-8027, September.
    5. Qijun He & Yungeng Li & Zhiyao Wu & Jingjing Su, 2022. "Explicating the Cognitive Process of a Physician’s Trust in Patients: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:235:y:2019:i:c:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.