IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v21y1985i2p115-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building an effective doctor-patient relationship: From patient satisfaction to patient participation

Author

Listed:
  • Speedling, Edward J.
  • Rose, David N.

Abstract

In this paper, the authors argue that patient satisfaction is an insufficient measure of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship. While shown to have a salutary effect on patient anxiety concerning illness and treatment, the only other significant outcome associated with levels of satisfaction is utilization behavior. This is not surprising, the authors argue, since prevailing conceptualizations of patient satisfaction fail to incorporate measures of patient participation in the therapeutic process. Evidence suggests that by encouraging patients to take an active role in their health care physicians can increase the effectiveness of their therapeutic activities. A method for involving patients is through incorporating their preferences into the physician's decision-making processes. An example of physician decision making which incorporates patient preferences is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Speedling, Edward J. & Rose, David N., 1985. "Building an effective doctor-patient relationship: From patient satisfaction to patient participation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 115-120, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:2:p:115-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90079-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Axel C. Mühlbacher & Andrew Sadler & Franz-Werner Dippel & Christin Juhnke, 2018. "Treatment Preferences in Germany Differ Among Apheresis Patients with Severe Hypercholesterolemia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 477-493, April.
    2. Werner, Perla & Vered, Iris, 2002. "Women's knowledge of new regulations about publicly funded medications for osteoporosis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 275-284, June.
    3. Gill, Liz & Cassia, Fabio & Cameron, Ian D. & Kurrle, Susan & Lord, Stephen & Fairhall, Nicola & Lockwood, Keri & Langron, Colleen, 2014. "Exploring client adherence factors related to clinical outcomes," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 197-204.
    4. Oana SABIE, 2019. "Social Assistance In Romania: Case Study For Bucharest District 5," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 26-42, March.
    5. Singh, Jagdip & Cuttler, Leona & Silvers, J. B., 2004. "Toward understanding consumers' role in medical decisions for emerging treatments: Issues, framework and hypotheses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 1054-1065, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:2:p:115-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.