IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i1p9-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behavior and effects of treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Heszen-Klemens, Irena
  • Lapinska, Elzbieta

Abstract

Studies of doctor-patient communication and its consequences are usually limited to factors that may determine patients' compliance with doctors' instructions. But many patients besides or instead of following doctors' advice undertake additional activity in order to get well. The purpose of this study was to explore the whole range of patients' health behavior, its connection with the process of doctor-patient interaction (as an independent variable) and with the treatment results (as a dependent variable). The direct effect of doctor-patient relationship on the outcome of treatment was also examined. The subjects were 62 out-patients. Two visits of every patient to his physician were tape-recorded and analyzed. To obtain the data concerning patients' health behavior, interviews were performed twice in every case. Treatment results were evaluated by physicians. It was found that some characteristics of the doctor-patient interaction; doctors' directiveness, doctors' emotional attitude towards the patient, patients' activity, patients' partnership status had an effect on patients' health behavior (compliance with doctors' orders and patients' spontaneous health activity). Even stronger was the connection between these with the degree of patients' compliance with doctors' instructions but were positively connected with the amount of patients' spontaneous health activity. Authors analyzed these findings in the light of psychosomatic medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Heszen-Klemens, Irena & Lapinska, Elzbieta, 1984. "Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behavior and effects of treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 9-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:1:p:9-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90132-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Probst, Markus, 2021. "Ohne Moos nichts los? Eine Discrete-Choice-Analyse der Präferenzen von Medizinstudenten für die Arbeit auf dem Land [No Mon, No Fun? A Discrete Choice Analysis of the Preferences of Medical Student," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 507-546.
    2. Street Jr., Richard L. & Gordon, Howard & Haidet, Paul, 2007. "Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: Is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 586-598, August.
    3. Gordon, Howard S. & Street, Richard Jr. & Adam Kelly, P. & Souchek, Julianne & Wray, Nelda P., 2005. "Physician-patient communication following invasive procedures: an analysis of post-angiogram consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 1015-1025, September.
    4. Friend-du Preez, Natalie & Cameron, Noël & Griffiths, Paula, 2013. "“So they believe that if the baby is sick you must give drugs…” The importance of medicines in health-seeking behaviour for childhood illnesses in urban South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 43-52.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:1:p:9-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.