IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v192y2017icp58-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), illness narratives and Elias's sociology of knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm, Dominic
  • Orme, Mark W.
  • Morgan, Mike D.
  • Sherar, Lauren B.

Abstract

This paper draws on Elias's sociology of knowledge to provide a critical assessment of illness narratives. Focusing on a cohort of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (n = 26), the paper employs a comparative analysis of mixed method data derived from qualitative interviews, quantitative questionnaires, and physiological and accelerometer testing. The article firstly compares four narratives conveyed in interviews with the broader paradigmatic approach to illness narratives and existing COPD-specific studies. It then explores the relationship between these ‘stories’ and COPD patients' biographical contingencies (e.g. age, wealth, context of diagnosis) and embodied condition (e.g. co-morbidities, lung function), demonstrating how illness narratives are shaped by both broader social structural factors and embodied experience. Invoking Elias we further find that different narrative subthemes are varyingly affected by patients' emotional engagement and ontological security and thus that people are differently enabled or constrained to present illness narratives that are consistent with their broader social and physical condition. Consequently, while narratives, social structure and embodied experience are interdependent, our reading of ‘truth’ must be sensitive to the social positioning of the ‘teller’ and the specific content being relayed. The paper therefore presents a more systematic, comparative, bio-psycho-social analysis than has hitherto been produced.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm, Dominic & Orme, Mark W. & Morgan, Mike D. & Sherar, Lauren B., 2017. "Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), illness narratives and Elias's sociology of knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 58-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:192:y:2017:i:c:p:58-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617305579
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Atkinson, 2009. "Illness Narratives Revisited: The Failure of Narrative Reductionism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(5), pages 196-205, November.
    2. Jordens, Christopher F. C. & Little, Miles & Paul, Kim & Sayers, Emma-Jane, 2001. "Life disruption and generic complexity: a social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 1227-1236, November.
    3. Faulkner, Alex & McNamee, Michael & Coveney, Catherine & Gabe, Jonathan, 2017. "Where biomedicalisation and magic meet: Therapeutic innovations of elite sports injury in British professional football and cycling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 136-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Housley & Robin James Smith, 2010. "Innovation and Reduction in Contemporary Qualitative Methods: The Case of Conceptual Coupling, Activity-Type Pairs and Auto-Ethnography," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(4), pages 36-46, November.
    2. Jane Fenton & Mark Smith, 2019. "‘You Can’t Say That!’: Critical Thinking, Identity Politics, and the Social Work Academy," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Paul Atkinson, 2009. "Illness Narratives Revisited: The Failure of Narrative Reductionism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(5), pages 196-205, November.
    4. Coveney, Catherine & Faulkner, Alex & Gabe, Jonathan & McNamee, Michael, 2020. "Beyond the orthodox/CAM dichotomy: Exploring therapeutic decision making, reasoning and practice in the therapeutic landscapes of elite sports medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Kane, Sumit & Joshi, Madhura & Mahal, Ajay & McPake, Barbara, 2023. "How social norms and values shape household healthcare expenditures and resource allocation: Insights from India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    6. J. D. Carpentieri & Jane Elliott & Caroline E. Brett & Ian J. Deary, 2017. "Adapting to Aging: Older People Talk About Their Use of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation to Maximize Well-being in the Context of Physical Decline," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(2), pages 351-361.
    7. Paloma Escamilla-Fajardo & Juan Manuel Núñez-Pomar & Vanessa Ratten & Josep Crespo, 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Soccer: Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:192:y:2017:i:c:p:58-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.