IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v184y2017icp75-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dangertalk: Voices of abortion providers

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, Lisa A.
  • Hassinger, Jane A.
  • Debbink, Michelle
  • Harris, Lisa H.

Abstract

Researchers have described the difficulties of doing abortion work, including the psychosocial costs to individual providers. Some have discussed the self-censorship in which providers engage in to protect themselves and the pro-choice movement. However, few have examined the costs of this self-censorship to public discourse and social movements in the US. Using qualitative data collected during abortion providers’ discussions of their work, we explore the tensions between their narratives and pro-choice discourse, and examine the types of stories that are routinely silenced – narratives we name “dangertalk”. Using these data, we theorize about the ways in which giving voice to these tensions might transform current abortion discourse by disrupting false dichotomies and better reflecting the complex realities of abortion. We present a conceptual model for dangertalk in abortion discourse, connecting it to functions of dangertalk in social movements more broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, Lisa A. & Hassinger, Jane A. & Debbink, Michelle & Harris, Lisa H., 2017. "Dangertalk: Voices of abortion providers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 75-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:184:y:2017:i:c:p:75-83
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617302964
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Layne, Linda L., 2003. "Unhappy endings: a feminist reappraisal of the women's health movement from the vantage of pregnancy loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 1881-1891, May.
    2. Harris, Lisa Hope & Debbink, Michelle & Martin, Lisa & Hassinger, Jane, 2011. "Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: Findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1062-1070.
    3. Roe, Kathleen M., 1989. "Private troubles and public issues: Providing abortion amid competing definitions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1191-1198, January.
    4. O’Donnell, Jenny & Weitz, Tracy A. & Freedman, Lori R., 2011. "Resistance and vulnerability to stigmatization in abortion work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1357-1364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Becker, Andréa & Hann, Lena R., 2021. "“It makes it more real”: Examining ambiguous fetal meanings in abortion care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Andaya, Elise & Campo-Engelstein, Lisa, 2021. "Conceptualizing Pain and Personhood in the Periviable Period: Perspectives from Reproductive Health and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Clinicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Mills, Lisa & Watermeyer, Jennifer, 2023. "A meta-ethnography on the experience and psychosocial implications of providing abortion care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    4. Marianne Kjelsvik & Ragnhild J. Tveit Sekse & Asgjerd Litleré Moi & Elin M. Aasen & Eva Gjengedal, 2018. "Walking on a tightrope—Caring for ambivalent women considering abortions in the first trimester," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4192-4202, November.
    5. Czarnecki, Danielle & Anspach, Renee R. & De Vries, Raymond G. & Dunn, Mercedez D. & Hauschildt, Katrina & Harris, Lisa H., 2019. "Conscience reconsidered: The moral work of navigating participation in abortion care on labor and delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 181-189.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mills, Lisa & Watermeyer, Jennifer, 2023. "A meta-ethnography on the experience and psychosocial implications of providing abortion care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    2. Becker, Andréa & Hann, Lena R., 2021. "“It makes it more real”: Examining ambiguous fetal meanings in abortion care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Beynon-Jones, Siân M., 2013. "‘We view that as contraceptive failure’: Containing the ‘multiplicity’ of contraception and abortion within Scottish reproductive healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 105-112.
    4. Miner, Skye A., 2019. "Demarcating the dirty work: Canadian Fertility professionals’ use of boundary-work in contentious egg donation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 19-26.
    5. Suh, Siri, 2014. "Rewriting abortion: Deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 20-33.
    6. Frederick, Angela, 2017. "Visibility, respectability, and disengagement: The everyday resistance of mothers with disabilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 131-138.
    7. Nelson, Hyeyoung Oh, 2024. "Experiencing birth trauma: Individualism and isolation in postpartum," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    8. Bergen, Sadie, 2022. "“The kind of doctor who doesn't believe doctor knows best”: Doctors for Choice and the medical voice in Irish abortion politics, 2002–2018," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    9. Harris, Lisa Hope & Debbink, Michelle & Martin, Lisa & Hassinger, Jane, 2011. "Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: Findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share Workshop," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1062-1070.
    10. van der Sijpt, Erica, 2010. "Marginal matters: Pregnancy loss as a social event," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1773-1779, November.
    11. Tiziana Ramaci & Massimiliano Barattucci & Caterina Ledda & Venerando Rapisarda, 2020. "Social Stigma during COVID-19 and its Impact on HCWs Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Heinsen, Laura Louise & Bruheim, Camilla & Adrian, Stine Willum, 2023. "Orchestrating moral bearability in the clinical management of second-trimester selective abortion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    13. Marianne Kjelsvik & Ragnhild J. Tveit Sekse & Asgjerd Litleré Moi & Elin M. Aasen & Eva Gjengedal, 2018. "Walking on a tightrope—Caring for ambivalent women considering abortions in the first trimester," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4192-4202, November.
    14. Steinberg, Julia R. & Tschann, Jeanne M. & Furgerson, Dorothy & Harper, Cynthia C., 2016. "Psychosocial factors and pre-abortion psychological health: The significance of stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 67-75.
    15. Izugbara, Chimaraoke O. & Egesa, Carolyne & Okelo, Rispah, 2015. "‘High profile health facilities can add to your trouble’: Women, stigma and un/safe abortion in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 9-18.
    16. Bove, Liliana L. & Pervan, Simon J., 2013. "Stigmatized labour: An overlooked service worker’s stress," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 259-263.
    17. Coleman-Minahan, Kate & Stevenson, Amanda Jean & Obront, Emily & Hays, Susan, 2021. "Judicial bypass attorneys’ experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:184:y:2017:i:c:p:75-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.