IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v155y2016icp51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enacting the molecular imperative: How gene-environment interaction research links bodies and environments in the post-genomic age

Author

Listed:
  • Darling, Katherine Weatherford
  • Ackerman, Sara L.
  • Hiatt, Robert H.
  • Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
  • Shim, Janet K.

Abstract

Despite a proclaimed shift from ‘nature versus nurture’ to ‘genes and environment’ paradigms within biomedical and genomic science, capturing the environment and identifying gene-environment interactions (GEIs) has remained a challenge. What does ‘the environment’ mean in the post-genomic age? In this paper, we present qualitative data from a study of 33 principal investigators funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health to conduct etiological research on three complex diseases (cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes). We examine their research practices and perspectives on the environment through the concept of molecularization: the social processes and transformations through which phenomena (diseases, identities, pollution, food, racial/ethnic classifications) are re-defined in terms of their molecular components and described in the language of molecular biology. We show how GEI researchers' expansive conceptualizations of the environment ultimately yield to the imperative to molecularize and personalize the environment. They seek to ‘go into the body’ and re-work the boundaries between bodies and environments. In the process, they create epistemic hinges to facilitate a turn from efforts to understand social and environmental exposures outside the body, to quantifying their effects inside the body. GEI researchers respond to these emergent imperatives with a mixture of excitement, ambivalence and frustration. We reflect on how GEI researchers struggle to make meaning of molecules in their work, and how they grapple with molecularization as a methodological and rhetorical imperative as well as a process transforming biomedical research practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Darling, Katherine Weatherford & Ackerman, Sara L. & Hiatt, Robert H. & Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin & Shim, Janet K., 2016. "Enacting the molecular imperative: How gene-environment interaction research links bodies and environments in the post-genomic age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 51-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:155:y:2016:i:c:p:51-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953616301071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shostak, Sara, 2003. "Locating gene-environment interaction: at the intersections of genetics and public health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 2327-2342, June.
    2. Krieger, N., 2008. "Proximal, distal, and the politics of causation: What's level got to do with it?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 221-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangaramoorthy, Thurka & Benton, Adia, 2022. "Intersectionality and syndemics: A commentary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    2. Qin Yang & Huaguo Chen & Baizhan Li, 2015. "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Indoor Dusts of Guizhou, Southwest of China: Status, Sources and Potential Human Health Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Mamo, Laura & Epstein, Steven, 2014. "The pharmaceuticalization of sexual risk: Vaccine development and the new politics of cancer prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 155-165.
    4. Frédéric Basso & Philippe Robert-Demontrond & Maryvonne Hayek & Jean-Luc Anton & Bruno Nazarian & Muriel Roth & Olivier Oullier, 2014. "Why People Drink Shampoo? Food Imitating Products Are Fooling Brains and Endangering Consumers for Marketing Purposes," Post-Print halshs-01183005, HAL.
    5. Basso, Frédéric & Robert-Demontrond, Philippe & Hayek, Maryvonne & Anton, Jean-Luc & Nazarian, Bruno & Roth, Muriel & Oullier, Olivier, 2014. "Why people drink shampoo? Food imitating products are fooling brains and endangering consumers for marketing purposes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59224, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Carol Bacchi, 2016. "Problematizations in Health Policy," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    7. Roy, Michael J. & Baker, Rachel & Kerr, Susan, 2017. "Conceptualising the public health role of actors operating outside of formal health systems: The case of social enterprise," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 144-152.
    8. Brenda T. Poon & Chris Atchison & Amanda Kwan, 2022. "Understanding the Influence of Community-Level Determinants on Children’s Social and Emotional Well-Being: A Systems Science and Participatory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Agovino, Massimiliano & Cerciello, Massimiliano & Musella, Gaetano, 2021. "Campania and cancer mortality: An inseparable pair? The role of environmental quality and socio-economic deprivation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    10. Vineis, Paolo & Delpierre, Cyrille & Castagné, Raphaële & Fiorito, Giovanni & McCrory, Cathal & Kivimaki, Mika & Stringhini, Silvia & Carmeli, Cristian & Kelly-Irving, Michelle, 2020. "Health inequalities: Embodied evidence across biological layers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. Bauer, Greta R., 2014. "Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 10-17.
    12. Fitzpatrick, Scott J. & Read, Donna & Brew, Bronwyn K. & Perkins, David, 2021. "A sociological autopsy lens on older adult suicide in rural Australia: Addressing health, psychosocial factors and care practices at the intersection of policies and institutions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    13. Anthony M Gould & Milène R Lokrou, 2018. "Paved with good intentions: Misdirected idealism in the lead-up to 2008’s GFC," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(4), pages 394-409, December.
    14. Anand, Sudhir, 2021. "The many faces of health justice," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112537, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Kari E. North & Lisa J. Martin, 2008. "The Importance of Gene—Environment Interaction," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(2), pages 164-200, November.
    16. Anna Brugulat-Panés & Lee Randall & Thiago Hérick de Sá & Megha Anil & Haowen Kwan & Lambed Tatah & James Woodcock & Ian R. Hambleton & Ebele R. I. Mogo & Lisa Micklesfield & Caitlin Pley & Ishtar Gov, 2023. "The Potential for Healthy, Sustainable, and Equitable Transport Systems in Africa and the Caribbean: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    17. Rapoport, L. & Poole, D.N. & Kazanas, K. & Mourtzaki, M. & Bump, J.B., 2020. "Distal determinants of mental health conditions (MHC) for asylum-seeking children in Greece: A health system enhancement study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1137-1145.
    18. Perkiö, Mikko, 2021. "How does women’s education influence infant survival? A structural equation model using aggregate data from 95 low- and middle-income countries," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Andrew McAuley & Cheryl Denny & Martin Taulbut & Rory Mitchell & Colin Fischbacher & Barbara Graham & Ian Grant & Paul O’Hagan & David McAllister & Gerry McCartney, 2016. "Informing Investment to Reduce Inequalities: A Modelling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Brisbois, Benjamin, 2016. "Bananas, pesticides and health in southwestern Ecuador: A scalar narrative approach to targeting public health responses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 184-191.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:155:y:2016:i:c:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.