Developing and validating a measure of community capacity: Why volunteers make the best neighbours

Social support and community connectedness are key determinants of both mental and physical wellbeing. While social capital has been used to indicate the instrumental value of these social relationships, its broad and often competing definitions have hindered practical applications of the concept. Within the health promotion field, the related concept of community capacity, the ability of a group to identify and act on problems, has gained prominence (Labonte and Laverack, 2001). The goal of this study was to develop and validate a scale measuring community capacity including exploring its associations with socio-demographic and civic behaviour variables among the residents of four small (populations 1500–2000) high-deprivation towns in southern New Zealand. The full (41-item) scale was found to have strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) but a process of reducing the scale resulted in a shorter 26-item instrument with similar internal consistency (alpha 0.88). Subscales of the reduced instrument displayed at least marginally acceptable levels of internal consistency (0.62–0.77). Using linear regression models, differences in community capacity scores were found for selected criterion, namely time spent living in the location, local voting, and volunteering behaviour, although the first of these was no longer statistically significant in an adjusted model with potential confounders including age, sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, employment, household income, and religious beliefs. This provides support for the scale's concurrent validity. Differences were present between the four towns in unadjusted models and remained statistically significant in adjusted models (including variables mentioned above) suggesting, crucially, that even when such factors are accounted for, perceptions of one's community may still depend on place.