IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v102y2014icp138-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing healthcare: Finding meaning in a clinical practice guideline for the management of non-specific low back pain

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, Nicky
  • Pope, Catherine
  • Roberts, Lisa
  • Crouch, Robert

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines produced by NICE – the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence – are seen as key mechanisms to regulate and standardise UK healthcare practice, but their development is known to be problematic, and their adoption and uptake variable. Examining what a guideline or health policy means to different audiences, and how it means something to those communities, provides new insight about interpretive discourses. In this paper we present a micro-analysis of the response of healthcare professionals to publication of a single NICE guideline in 2009 which proposed a re-organisation of professional services for chronic non-specific low back pain. Adopting an interpretive approach, we seek to understand both the meaning of the guideline and the socio-political events associated with it. Drawing on archived policy documents related to the development and publication of the guideline, texts published in professional journals and on web-sites, and semi-structured interview data from professionals associated with the debate, we identify a key discourse that positions the management of chronic non-specific low back pain within physician jurisdiction. We examine the emergence of this discourse through policy-related symbolic artifacts taking the form of specific languages, objects and acts. This discourse effectively resisted and displaced the service reorganisation proposed by the guideline and, in so doing, ensured medical hegemony within practice and professional organisations concerned with the management of non-specific low back pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, Nicky & Pope, Catherine & Roberts, Lisa & Crouch, Robert, 2014. "Governing healthcare: Finding meaning in a clinical practice guideline for the management of non-specific low back pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 138-145.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:102:y:2014:i:c:p:138-145
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953613006679
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moreira, Tiago, 2005. "Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 1975-1985, May.
    2. Rhodes, Lorna A. & McPhillips-Tangum, Carol A. & Markham, Christine & Klenk, Rebecca, 1999. "The power of the visible: the meaning of diagnostic tests in chronic back pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1189-1203, May.
    3. May, Carl & Doyle, Helen & Chew-Graham, Carolyn, 1999. "Medical knowledge and the intractable patient: the case of chronic low back pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 523-534, February.
    4. Schubert, Cornelius, 2011. "Making sure. A comparative micro-analysis of diagnostic instruments in medical practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 851-857, September.
    5. Armstrong, David, 2002. "Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: the problem of changing doctors' behaviour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(10), pages 1771-1777, November.
    6. Jutel, Annemarie & Nettleton, Sarah, 2011. "Towards a sociology of diagnosis: Reflections and opportunities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 793-800, September.
    7. Mizrachi, Nissim & Shuval, Judith T., 2005. "Between formal and enacted policy: changing the contours of boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 1649-1660, April.
    8. Spyridonidis, Dimitrios & Calnan, Michael, 2011. "Opening the black box: A study of the process of NICE guidelines implementation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 117-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel A. Menchik, 2019. "Tethered Venues: Discerning Distant Influences on a Field Site," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(4), pages 850-876, November.
    2. Zarhin, Dana & Negev, Maya & Vulfsons, Simon & Sznitman, Sharon R., 2018. "Rhetorical and regulatory boundary-work: The case of medical cannabis policy-making in Israel," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 1-9.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Higgins, Angela & Porter, Sam & O'Halloran, Peter, 2014. "General practitioners' management of the long-term sick role," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 52-60.
    2. Maslen, Sarah & Harris, Anna, 2021. "Becoming a diagnostic agent: A collated ethnography of digital-sensory work in caregiving intra-actions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Armstrong, Natalie & Hilton, Paul, 2014. "Doing diagnosis: Whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 208-214.
    4. Brown, Eliza, 2020. "Projected diagnosis, anticipatory medicine, and uncertainty: How medical providers ‘rule out’ potential pregnancy in contraceptive counseling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Clinch, Megan & Benson, John, 2013. "Making information ‘relevant’: General Practitioner judgments and the production of patient involvement," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 104-111.
    6. Perrotta, Manuela & Geampana, Alina, 2020. "The trouble with IVF and randomised control trials: Professional legitimation narratives on time-lapse imaging and evidence-informed care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Lösch, Lea & Willems, Willemine & Bongers, Marloes & Timen, Aura & Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun, 2023. "Kaleidoscopic integration: Advancing the integration of incommensurable knowledge in healthcare guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    8. Timmermans, Stefan & Almeling, Rene, 2009. "Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care: A conceptual readjustment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 21-27, July.
    9. Locock, Louise & Nettleton, Sarah & Kirkpatrick, Susan & Ryan, Sara & Ziebland, Sue, 2016. "‘I knew before I was told’: Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 85-92.
    10. Jovanovic, Maja, 2014. "Creating the ‘dis-ease’ of high cholesterol: A sociology of diagnosis reception analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 120-128.
    11. Nettleton, Sarah & Kitzinger, Jenny & Kitzinger, Celia, 2014. "A diagnostic illusory? The case of distinguishing between “vegetative” and “minimally conscious” states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 134-141.
    12. May, Carl & Rapley, Tim & Moreira, Tiago & Finch, Tracy & Heaven, Ben, 2006. "Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 1022-1030, February.
    13. Walshe, Catherine & Chew-Graham, Carolyn & Todd, Chris & Caress, Ann, 2008. "What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 137-146, July.
    14. Allen, Davina, 2009. "From boundary concept to boundary object: The practice and politics of care pathway development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 354-361, August.
    15. Bourret, Pascale & Keating, Peter & Cambrosio, Alberto, 2011. "Regulating diagnosis in post-genomic medicine: Re-aligning clinical judgment?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 816-824, September.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13557 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lagerlöf, Helena & Eriksson, Lena & Sager, Morten, 2024. "Organizing implementation in healthcare: Balancing orders of worth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    18. Nigam, Amit, 2012. "Changing health care quality paradigms: The rise of clinical guidelines and quality measures in American medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(11), pages 1933-1937.
    19. O'Connor, Cliodhna & Downs, Johnny & McNicholas, Fiona & Cross, Lauren & Shetty, Hitesh, 2020. "Documenting diagnosis in child and adolescent mental healthcare: A content analysis of diagnostic statements in a psychiatric case register," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    20. Yufan Xu, 2024. "Boundaries and classification: the cultural logic of treating foreign medicine," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    21. Louise Hoyle & Aimee Grant, 2015. "Treatment targets in emergency departments: nurses’ views of how they affect clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2211-2218, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:102:y:2014:i:c:p:138-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.