IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v83y2022ics0038012122001264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the spatial accessibility of medical resources taking into account the residents' choice behavior of outpatient and inpatient medical treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Zhongyu
  • Bai, Jianjun
  • Feng, Ruitao

Abstract

The assessment of the accessibility for medical resources is of great significance for understanding the distribution characteristics and optimizing the space allocation of medical resources. This paper incorporated the probability statistical data of actual medical treatment choice behavior of residents into the formulation of accessibility. We constructed a health facility accessibility index combined the travel time with waiting time and an improved three-step floating catchment area method to evaluate the accessibility of outpatient and inpatient treatment for residents. Results showed the accessibility of outpatient and inpatient treatment has significant geographical differentiation characteristics and presents a distribution pattern of high in the eastern and central China and low in the western. The outpatient medical service was available for residents, which there are more than 85% of the population having access to medical services within 30min.The accessibility of inpatient treatment presents a radiological distribution model with provincial capital city as the core, in which the spatial allocation of high-quality medical resources is not balanced and the regional difference is obvious. This study demonstrated the geographical differentiation characteristics of spatial distribution for the accessibility of medical resources in China, which can provide targeted proposals according to medical institutions level.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Zhongyu & Bai, Jianjun & Feng, Ruitao, 2022. "Evaluating the spatial accessibility of medical resources taking into account the residents' choice behavior of outpatient and inpatient medical treatment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s0038012122001264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122001264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui-Ching Wu & Ming-Hseng Tseng, 2018. "Evaluating Disparities in Elderly Community Care Resources: Using a Geographic Accessibility and Inequality Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Ye, Changdong & Hu, Lingqian & Li, Min, 2018. "Urban green space accessibility changes in a high-density city: A case study of Macau from 2010 to 2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 106-115.
    3. Xiaofang Pan & Mei-Po Kwan & Lin Yang & Shunping Zhou & Zejun Zuo & Bo Wan, 2018. "Evaluating the Accessibility of Healthcare Facilities Using an Integrated Catchment Area Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Lei Zhu & Shuang Zhong & Wei Tu & Jing Zheng & Shenjing He & Junzhe Bao & Cunrui Huang, 2019. "Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Medical Resources at the Community Level in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Yun Liu & Qingxia Kong & Shasha Yuan & Joris van de Klundert, 2018. "Factors influencing choice of health system access level in China: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Yang, Nan & Shen, Liyin & Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Shiju & Peng, Yi & Wang, Jinhuan, 2021. "An integrative method for analyzing spatial accessibility in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Khan, Abdullah A., 1992. "An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 275-287, October.
    8. Pizzol, Bruna & Giannotti, Mariana & Tomasiello, Diego Bogado, 2021. "Qualifying accessibility to education to investigate spatial equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingya Luan & Yuhong Tian & Chi Yung Jim & Xu Liu & Mengxuan Yan & Lizhu Wu, 2023. "Assessing Spatial Accessibility of Community Hospitals for the Elderly in Beijing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Li, Chuanyao & Wang, Junren, 2022. "A hierarchical two-step floating catchment area analysis for high-tier hospital accessibility in an urban agglomeration region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Wei, Zhongyu & Bai, Jianjun & Feng, Ruitao, 2023. "Optimization referral rate design for hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system based on accessibility-utilization efficiency bi-objective collaboration: A case study of China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    4. Meijie Chen & Yumin Chen & Xiaoguang Wang & Huangyuan Tan & Fenglan Luo, 2019. "Spatial Difference of Transit-Based Accessibility to Hospitals by Regions Using Spatially Adjusted ANOVA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Huanhuan Zhu & Lin Pan & Yiji Li & Huiming Jin & Qian Wang & Xin Liu & Cong Wang & Peng Liao & Xinyang Jiang & Luo Li, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility Assessment of Prehospital EMS with a Focus on the Elderly Population: A Case Study in Ningbo, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Amritpal Kaur Khakh & Victoria Fast & Rizwan Shahid, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Primary Healthcare Services by Multimodal Means of Travel: Synthesis and Case Study in the City of Calgary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Ming-Hseng Tseng & Hui-Ching Wu, 2021. "Integrating Socioeconomic Status and Spatial Factors to Improve the Accessibility of Community Care Resources Using Maximum-Equity Optimization of Supply Capacity Allocation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Linlin Zhang & Xiaobin Zhang & Huiling Huang & Liang Zhang & Huan Li, 2022. "Spatial Accessibility of Multiple Facilities for Affordable Housing Neighborhoods in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Chen, Wendong & Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Cao, Mengqiu, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Wang, Tianyu & Wen, Ke & Gao, Qiuming & Sun, Ruochen, 2023. "Small money, big change: The distributional impact of differentiated doctor's visit fee on healthcare utilization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    11. Fahui Wang & Quan Tang, 2013. "Planning toward Equal Accessibility to Services: A Quadratic Programming Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(2), pages 195-212, April.
    12. Chia-Mei Shih & Yu-Hua Wang & Li-Fan Liu & Jung-Hua Wu, 2020. "Profile of Long-Term Care Recipients Receiving Home and Community-Based Services and the Factors That Influence Utilization in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Lei Mu & Lijun Xing & Ying Jing & Qinjiang Hu, 2023. "Spatial Optimization of Park Green Spaces by an Improved Two-Step Optimization Model from the Perspective of Maximizing Accessibility Equity," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Hui-Ching Wu & Ming-Hseng Tseng & Chuan-Chao Lin, 2020. "Assessment on Distributional Fairness of Physical Rehabilitation Resource Allocation: Geographic Accessibility Analysis Integrating Google Rating Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Bittencourt, Tainá A. & Giannotti, Mariana, 2023. "Evaluating the accessibility and availability of public services to reduce inequalities in everyday mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. Jiahui Qin & Shijia Luo & Disheng Yi & Heping Jiang & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Measuring Cluster-Based Spatial Access to Shopping Stores under Real-Time Travel Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Jui-che Tu & Kang-Chi Lin & Hong-Yi Chen, 2020. "Investigating the Relationship between the Third Places and the Level of Happiness for Seniors in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-11, February.
    18. Xiaoxiao Liu & Judy E. Seidel & Terrence McDonald & Alka B. Patel & Nigel Waters & Stefania Bertazzon & Rizwan Shahid & Deborah A. Marshall, 2022. "Rural–Urban Disparities in Realized Spatial Access to General Practitioners, Orthopedic Surgeons, and Physiotherapists among People with Osteoarthritis in Alberta, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-27.
    20. Matthew Tuson & Berwin Turlach & Kevin Murray & Mei Ruu Kok & Alistair Vickery & David Whyatt, 2021. "Predicting Future Geographic Hotspots of Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations Using All Subset Model Selection and Repeated K-Fold Cross-Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:83:y:2022:i:c:s0038012122001264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.