IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v44y2010i2p100-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving customer experience in tourism: A framework for stakeholder collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Gopalan, Ram
  • Narayan, Bindu

Abstract

Tourism represents a service industry replete with unique complexities since a tourist's overall experience is modulated by multiple stakeholders, e.g., immigration officials at airports, policy makers responsible for investment in transportation infrastructure and managers at various tourist attractions. Effective management of customer satisfaction in this service sector entails cross-functional collaboration and a transparent measurement scheme that clearly delineates the impact of each stakeholder's actions on overall customer experience. In this paper, we propose a simple conceptual framework for stakeholder collaboration in tourism. A four-phase customer experience measurement process is developed to prioritize resource allocation and to increase tourists' advocacy levels for a destination. The proposed measurement framework has wide applicability and can also be exercised in the context of other public sector services, e.g., mass transit systems. We illustrate the process using an empirical case study at Chennai, a tourist destination in India and provide a number of substantive insights that are valid for this destination.

Suggested Citation

  • Gopalan, Ram & Narayan, Bindu, 2010. "Improving customer experience in tourism: A framework for stakeholder collaboration," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 100-112, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:44:y:2010:i:2:p:100-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038-0121(09)00042-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan P. Caulkins, 1993. "Zero-Tolerance Policies: Do They Inhibit or Stimulate Illicit Drug Consumption?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 458-476, April.
    2. Baveja, Alok & Caulkins, Jonathan P. & Liu, Wensheng & Batta, Rajan & Karwan, Mark H., 1997. "When haste makes sense: Cracking down on street markets for illicit drugs," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 293-306, December.
    3. Vargas, Luis G., 1990. "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 2-8, September.
    4. Baveja, A. & Feichtinger, G. & Hartl, R.F. & Haunschmied, J.L. & Kort, P.M., 1999. "A Resource-Constrained Optimal Control Model for Crackdown on Illicit Drug Markets," Other publications TiSEM 8648e4a1-5cc5-4167-8aad-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Correa, Hector & Parker, Barnett R., 2005. "An application of organizational input-output analysis to hospital management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 307-333, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kincses, Áron & Tóth, Géza & Tömöri, Mihály & Michalkó, Gábor, 2017. "Characteristics of transit tourism in Hungary with a focus on expenditure," MPRA Paper 76854, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Pardo-García, C. & Coll-Serrano, V. & Rausell-Köster, P. & Pérez Bustamante-Yábar, D., 2018. "Cultural attitudes and tourist destination prescription," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 59-61.
    3. Erdogan Koc, & Aybeniz Akdeniz Ar, & Gulnil Aydin, 2017. "The Potential Implications Of Indulgence And Restraint On Service Encounters In Tourism And Hospitality," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, august.
    4. Francesco Scotti & Andrea Flori & Piercesare Secchi & Marika Arena & Giovanni Azzone, 2024. "Heterogeneous drivers of overnight and same-day visits," Papers 2402.05679, arXiv.org.
    5. Alonso-Almeida, María del Mar & Giglio, Carlo & Iazzolino, Gianpaolo, 2024. "A cross-country analysis of decision-making factors influencing tourists’ shift towards circular destinations in EU-27," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. María Magdalena Solís-Radilla & Lucio Hernández-Lobato & Luis Jose Callarisa-Fiol & Héctor T. Pastor-Durán, 2019. "The Importance of Sustainability in the Loyalty to a Tourist Destination through the Management of Expectations and Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Claudia E Henninger & Caroline Foster & Panayiota J Alevizou & Chris Frohlich, 2016. "Stakeholder engagement in the city branding process," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 285-298, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Redmond, Michael & Baveja, Alok, 2002. "A data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 660-678, September.
    2. Kaya, C. Yalcin, 2004. "Time-optimal switching control for the US cocaine epidemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 57-72, March.
    3. Poret, Sylvaine, 2009. "An optimal anti-drug law enforcement policy," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 221-228, September.
    4. Melachrinoudis, Emanuel & Min, Hokey, 2000. "The dynamic relocation and phase-out of a hybrid, two-echelon plant/warehousing facility: A multiple objective approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Caulkins, Jonathan P. & Reuter, Peter, 2006. "Illicit drug markets and economic irregularities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Lucas, Rochelle Irene & Promentilla, Michael Angelo & Ubando, Aristotle & Tan, Raymond Girard & Aviso, Kathleen & Yu, Krista Danielle, 2017. "An AHP-based evaluation method for teacher training workshop on information and communication technology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 93-100.
    7. Muhammad Afzal & Abdul Rasheed & Khalil-Ur-Rehman, 2023. "Evaluation of Behavioral Biases and Investment Decision: An Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX)," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(4), pages 126-134.
    8. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Mesnard, Alice & Perrault, Tiffanie, 2023. "Weeding out the dealers? The economics of cannabis legalization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 62-101.
    9. Mohammad Kanan & Ansa Rida Dilshad & Sadaf Zahoor & Amjad Hussain & Muhammad Salman Habib & Amjad Mehmood & Zaher Abusaq & Allam Hamdan & Jihad Asad, 2023. "An Empirical Study of the Implementation of an Integrated Ergo-Green-Lean Framework: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    10. George Gaprindashvili & Cees Westen, 2016. "Generation of a national landslide hazard and risk map for the country of Georgia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(1), pages 69-101, January.
    11. Aleksandra Król-Badziak & Jerzy Kozyra & Stelios Rozakis, 2024. "Evaluation of Climate Suitability for Maize Production in Poland under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Zsuzsanna Katalin Szabo & Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Gabriela C. Stănciulescu & Dalma Szabo, 2021. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritisation of Strategic Objectives of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Asma M. A. Bahurmoz, 2003. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process at Dar Al-Hekma, Saudi Arabia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 70-78, August.
    14. Shuping Huang & Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch & Weicong Fu & Jinda Qi & Ziru Chen & Zhipeng Zhu & Jianwen Dong, 2018. "Does Adding Local Tree Elements into Dwellings Enhance Individuals’ Homesickness? Scenario-Visualisation for Developing Sustainable Rural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Skott, Peter & Thorlund Jepsen, Gunnar, 2002. "Paradoxical effects of drug policy in a model with imperfect competition and switching costs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 335-354, August.
    16. Roee Sarel, 2022. "Crime and punishment in times of pandemics," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 155-186, October.
    17. Abbasi, H.N. & Zeeshan, Muhammad, 2023. "An integrated Geographic Information System and Analytical Hierarchy process based approach for site suitability analysis of on-grid hybrid concentrated solar-biomass powerplant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Bondarev, Anton, 2014. "Endogenous specialization of heterogeneous innovative activities of firms under the technological spillovers," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 235-249.
    19. Paweł Cabała, 2010. "Using the analytic hierarchy process in evaluating decision alternatives," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 20(1), pages 5-23.
    20. Gutiérrez, R.E. & Haro, P. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2021. "Techno-economic and operational assessment of concentrated solar power plants with a dual supporting system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:44:y:2010:i:2:p:100-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.