IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v17y2001i2p151-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics, morality and the subject: the contribution of Zygmunt Bauman and Michel Foucault to 'postmodern' business ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Kelemen, Mihaela
  • Peltonen, Tuomo

Abstract

This paper discusses a 'postmodern' alternative to business ethics in the light of two authors: Zygmunt Bauman and Michel Foucault. Despite their different usage of the concepts 'ethics' and 'morality', both offer an approach to ethics that avoids the problems of a self-enclosed subject inherent in liberal as well as in communal theories. Bauman and Foucault demonstrate how the continuation of social dialogue suffers from the postulation of fixed individual and organizational identities. Managers and other participants cannot formulate ethical rules on their own, but neither can they come together as a community without tensions and difference. Instead, embodied engagement in the reciprocal play of interpretations and influences keeps us ethically attuned to the limits of reason.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelemen, Mihaela & Peltonen, Tuomo, 2001. "Ethics, morality and the subject: the contribution of Zygmunt Bauman and Michel Foucault to 'postmodern' business ethics," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 151-166, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:17:y:2001:i:2:p:151-166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095652219900038X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lindfelt, Lise-Lotte, 2002. "Corporate social responsibility in the new global economy," Occasional Papers 2002/1, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies.
    2. Kristina Auxtova & Mary Brennan & Stephen Dunne, 2021. "To Be or Not to Be Governed Like That? Harmful and/or Offensive Advertising Complaints in the United Kingdom’s (Self-) Regulatory Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 425-446, September.
    3. Mark Edwards & Nin Kirkham, 2014. "Situating ‘Giving Voice to Values’: A Metatheoretical Evaluation of a New Approach to Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 477-495, May.
    4. Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar & Fahreen Alamgir, 2018. "Ethics of Resistance in Organisations: A Conceptual Proposal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-43, April.
    5. Clément Longondjo Etambakonga & Julia Roloff, 2020. "Protecting Environment or People? Pitfalls and Merits of Informal Labour in the Congolese Recycling Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 815-834, February.
    6. Shathees Baskaran & Nomahaza Mahadi & Thanabalan Tangaraja & Tai Mee Yuen & Saravin Kumar Binu Kumar, 2018. "Exploration and Integration of Ethical Leadership Potential Dimensions and Differential Employee Voice Behaviour – A Strategic Management Perspective," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 272-289, December.
    7. Kociatkiewicz, Jerzy & Kostera, Monika, 2018. "After retrotopia? The future of organizing and the thought of Zygmunt Bauman," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 335-342.
    8. Egels-Zandén, Niklas, 2016. "Not made in China: Integration of social sustainability into strategy at Nudie Jeans Co," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-51.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:17:y:2001:i:2:p:151-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.