IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v73y2025ipas0275531924003258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of positive language in equity crowdfunding pitches and fundraising success: The moderating role of punctuation

Author

Listed:
  • Gallucci, Carmen
  • Salvi, Antonio
  • Santulli, Rosalia
  • Tipaldi, Riccardo

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between positive language use in equity crowdfunding pitches and fundraising outcomes, with a focus on the moderating role of punctuation. By analyzing 772 campaigns across 25 platforms in France, Israel, Italy, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates, the study provides evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship. Results, framed within signaling theory, reveal that while initial positive language boosts equity collection among backers, further use beyond the inflection point leads to worsening fundraising outcomes. Additionally, punctuation dampens the initial positive effects of positive language use and mitigates the negative returns associated with further positive language use. The paper discusses theoretical implications for academia and practical implications for practitioners and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Gallucci, Carmen & Salvi, Antonio & Santulli, Rosalia & Tipaldi, Riccardo, 2025. "The use of positive language in equity crowdfunding pitches and fundraising success: The moderating role of punctuation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:73:y:2025:i:pa:s0275531924003258
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003258
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:73:y:2025:i:pa:s0275531924003258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.