IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v55y2021ics0275531920309405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics and mechanisms of not-fully marketized interest rates: Evidence from Chinese online lending

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Rongda
  • Chen, Yikai
  • Jin, Chenglu
  • Xu, Guorui
  • Bao, Weiwei
  • Guo, Kenan

Abstract

Most of the online lending rate are predominately determined by the platform, especially in the Chinese online lending markets, which indicates that the online lending rate is “not-fully marketized”. Based on a sample of 20 representative online lending platforms with daily data during June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018 collected from Net credit eye and Lingyicaijing, our results, first, show that the average duration of loans, pending balance, newly added investors, and relative repayment amount are all significant factors for online lending rates. Second, from the view of the whole industry, the increase of the new investors also attracts more risk-seeking investors enter into the industry, who have considerable influences on online lending rates. Finally, when considering the credit rating of each individual platform, the explanatory power of the above factors is gradually weakened as the platform rating declines. This interesting finding suggests that the online lending rate of any platform can reasonably reflect its risks if the platforms keep better regulatory compliance. Our results provide theoretical and empirical supports for both regulators and investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Rongda & Chen, Yikai & Jin, Chenglu & Xu, Guorui & Bao, Weiwei & Guo, Kenan, 2021. "Characteristics and mechanisms of not-fully marketized interest rates: Evidence from Chinese online lending," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:55:y:2021:i:c:s0275531920309405
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531920309405
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herzenstein, Michal & Dholakia, Utpal M. & Andrews, Rick L., 2011. "Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 27-36.
    2. Guo, Yanhong & Zhou, Wenjun & Luo, Chunyu & Liu, Chuanren & Xiong, Hui, 2016. "Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 417-426.
    3. Ding, Jie & Huang, Jinbo & Li, Yong & Meng, Meichen, 2019. "Is there an effective reputation mechanism in peer-to-peer lending? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 208-215.
    4. Mild, Andreas & Waitz, Martin & Wöckl, Jürgen, 2015. "How low can you go? — Overcoming the inability of lenders to set proper interest rates on unsecured peer-to-peer lending markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1291-1305.
    5. Ali Nazaritehrani & Behzad Mashali, 2020. "Development of E-banking channels and market share in developing countries," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Huan Tang, 2019. "Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1900-1938.
    7. Gao, Guang-Xin & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Fang, Xin & Lim, Yun Fong, 2018. "Optimal Stackelberg strategies for financing a supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 585-597.
    8. Zhu, Zongyuan, 2018. "Safety promise, moral hazard and financial supervision: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-5.
    9. Seth Freedman & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2008. "Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.com," Working Papers 08-43, NET Institute.
    10. Farrukh Shahzad & Zeeshan Fareed & Bushra Zulfiqar & Umme Habiba & Muhammad Ikram, 2019. "Does abnormal lending behavior increase bank riskiness? Evidence from Turkey," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Pramesh Singh & Jayaram Uparna & Panagiotis Karampourniotis & Emoke-Agnes Horvat & Boleslaw Szymanski & Gyorgy Korniss & Jonathan Z Bakdash & Brian Uzzi, 2018. "Peer-to-peer lending and bias in crowd decision-making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Liu, He & Qiao, Han & Wang, Shouyang & Li, Yuze, 2019. "Platform Competition in Peer-to-Peer Lending Considering Risk Control Ability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 280-290.
    13. Riza Emekter & Yanbin Tu & Benjamas Jirasakuldech & Min Lu, 2015. "Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 54-70, January.
    14. Boris Vallée & Yao Zeng, 2019. "Marketplace Lending: A New Banking Paradigm?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 1939-1982.
    15. Sumit Agarwal, 2010. "Distance and Private Information in Lending," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(7), pages 2757-2788, July.
    16. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Rad, Jacqueline & Weber, Martina, 2017. "Pricing in the online invoice trading market: First empirical evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 56-61.
    17. Jefferson Duarte & Stephan Siegel & Lance Young, 2012. "Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(8), pages 2455-2484.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Ming & Yin, Mingmei & Chen, Zhongfei, 2021. "Do investors prefer borrowers from high level of trust cities? Evidence from China’s P2P market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Xin, Xinyi & Zhang, Anquan & Liu, Lu, 2024. "Study on the influence of Internet finance on urban household savings rate: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 45-61.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, He & Qiao, Han & Wang, Shouyang & Li, Yuze, 2019. "Platform Competition in Peer-to-Peer Lending Considering Risk Control Ability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 280-290.
    2. Wang, Chengfu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Jin, Wei & Fan, Xiaojun, 2022. "Credit guarantee types for financing retailers through online peer-to-peer lending: Equilibrium and coordinating strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 380-392.
    3. Yingxiu Zhao & Wei Zhang & Xiangyu Kong, 2019. "Dynamic Cross-Correlations between Participants’ Attentions to P2P Lending and Offline Loan in the Private Lending Market," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-8, December.
    4. Dongwoo Kim, 2023. "Can investors’ collective decision-making evolve? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending markets," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1323-1358, June.
    5. Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Daniel Palacios-Marqués, 2022. "Crowdlending: mapping the core literature and research frontiers," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2381-2411, November.
    6. Croux, Christophe & Jagtiani, Julapa & Korivi, Tarunsai & Vulanovic, Milos, 2020. "Important factors determining Fintech loan default: Evidence from a lendingclub consumer platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 270-296.
    7. Štefan Lyócsa & Petra Vašaničová & Branka Hadji Misheva & Marko Dávid Vateha, 2022. "Default or profit scoring credit systems? Evidence from European and US peer-to-peer lending markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Xueru Chen & Xiaoji Hu & Shenglin Ben, 2021. "How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1055-1082, December.
    9. Qizhi Tao & Yizhe Dong & Ziming Lin, 2017. "Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 425-441, June.
    10. Li, Zhiyong & Li, Aimin & Bellotti, Anthony & Yao, Xiao, 2023. "The profitability of online loans: A competing risks analysis on default and prepayment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 968-985.
    11. Li, Jianwen, 2023. "MSMEs meet FinTech: Chance or challenge?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Benjamin Käfer, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201622, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    13. Qizhi Tao & Yizhe Dong & Ziming Lin, 0. "Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    14. Sha, Yezhou, 2022. "Rating manipulation and creditworthiness for platform economy: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Wang, Bo & Yu, Yunjun & Yang, Ziying & Zhang, Xiaomei, 2021. "Microfinance institutions and Peer-to-Peer lending: What does microfinance competition bring?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Efstathios Polyzos & Aristeidis Samitas & Ghulame Rubbaniy, 2024. "The perfect bail‐in: Financing without banks using peer‐to‐peer lending," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 3393-3412, July.
    17. Serena Gallo, 2021. "Fintech platforms: Lax or careful borrowers’ screening?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, December.
    18. Chen, Xiao & Huang, Bihong & Shaban, Mohamed, 2022. "Naïve or sophisticated? Information disclosure and investment decisions in peer to peer lending," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Gao, Guang-Xin & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Fang, Xin & Lim, Yun Fong, 2018. "Optimal Stackelberg strategies for financing a supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 585-597.
    20. Erel, Isil & Liebersohn, Jack, 2022. "Can FinTech reduce disparities in access to finance? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 90-118.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:55:y:2021:i:c:s0275531920309405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.