IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/revfin/v25y2015icp19-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling fund and portfolio risk: A bi-modal approach to analyzing risk in turbulent markets

Author

Listed:
  • Karagiannidis, Iordanis
  • Sykes Wilford, D.

Abstract

Following the financial crisis of 2008, it has been argued that Value at Risk (VaR), and risk analysis in general, failed to alert risk managers of the turbulence on the horizon. This is a misguided view that should not have come as a surprise because many widely circulated academic papers and discussions suggested, well before the crisis, that simple VaR results could easily be misinterpreted if the circumstances for its proper use are not fully understood. This paper addresses some ways in which VaR concepts may be applied more effectively. Non-standard Monte Carlo simulations are utilized. Whereas standard mean–variance defined methodologies using Monte Carlo analysis may not capture how “fat” a lower tail may actually be, a bi-modal switching structure between assumed normal periods and possible turbulent economic periods may help resolve the problem. Lower boundaries (worst case paths) of the different (normal versus bi-modal) processes are mapped to illustrate implied riskiness of portfolios if turbulence occurs. The analysis implies that no mechanical risk analysis is sufficiently divorced from a judgment call about possible market disruptions; however, a bi-modal approach allows quantification of the said judgment in conjunction with empirical observations from history.

Suggested Citation

  • Karagiannidis, Iordanis & Sykes Wilford, D., 2015. "Modeling fund and portfolio risk: A bi-modal approach to analyzing risk in turbulent markets," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 19-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:revfin:v:25:y:2015:i:c:p:19-26
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rfe.2015.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058330015000191
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rutledge, John, 2015. "Economics as energy framework: Complexity, turbulence, financial crises, and protectionism," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 10-18.
    2. Wilford, D. Sykes, 2012. "True Markowitz or assumptions we break and why it matters," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 93-101.
    3. Putnam, Bluford H. & Sykes Wilford, D. & Zecher, Philip D., 2002. "A short note on the concept of risk management and VaR for asset management firms," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 205-212.
    4. Pritsker, Matthew, 2006. "The hidden dangers of historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 561-582, February.
    5. Alexander, Carol & Sheedy, Elizabeth, 2008. "Developing a stress testing framework based on market risk models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2220-2236, October.
    6. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    7. WILFORD, D Sykes, 2014. "Risk management insights from Markowitz optimization for constructing portfolios with commodity futures," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 141-150.
    8. Norland, Erik & Wilford, D. Sykes, 2002. "Leverage, liquidity, volatility, time horizon, and the risk of ruin: A barrier option approach," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 225-239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iordanis Karagiannidis & D. Sykes Wilford, 2015. "Modeling fund and portfolio risk: A bi‐modal approach to analyzing risk in turbulent markets," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 19-26, April.
    2. Vladimir Rankovic & Mikica Drenovak & Branko Uroševic & Ranko Jelic, 2016. "Mean Univariate-GARCH VaR Portfolio Optimization: Actual Portfolio Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 5731, CESifo.
    3. Wilford, D. Sykes, 2012. "True Markowitz or assumptions we break and why it matters," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 93-101.
    4. Apergis, Emmanuel & Apergis, Iraklis & Apergis, Nicholas, 2019. "A new macro stress testing approach for financial realignment in the Eurozone," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 52-80.
    5. O’Brien, James & Szerszeń, Paweł J., 2017. "An evaluation of bank measures for market risk before, during and after the financial crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 215-234.
    6. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2015. "Shortfall Deviation Risk: An alternative to risk measurement," Papers 1501.02007, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    7. Basu, Sanjay, 2011. "Comparing simulation models for market risk stress testing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 329-339, August.
    8. Pérignon, Christophe & Smith, Daniel R., 2010. "The level and quality of Value-at-Risk disclosure by commercial banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 362-377, February.
    9. Siburg, Karl Friedrich & Stoimenov, Pavel & Weiß, Gregor N.F., 2015. "Forecasting portfolio-Value-at-Risk with nonparametric lower tail dependence estimates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 129-140.
    10. Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Ceretta, Paulo Sergio, 2015. "A comparison of Expected Shortfall estimation models," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 14-47.
    11. Weiß, Gregor N.F., 2011. "Are Copula-GoF-tests of any practical use? Empirical evidence for stocks, commodities and FX futures," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 173-188, May.
    12. Ranković, Vladimir & Ivanović, Miloš & Urošević, Branko & Jelic, Ranko, 2017. "Market risk management in a post-Basel II regulatory environmentAuthor-Name: Drenovak, Mikica," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 1030-1044.
    13. D. Sykes Wilford, 2012. "True Markowitz or assumptions we break and why it matters," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 93-101, September.
    14. Akosah, Nana Kwame & Alagidede, Imhotep Paul & Schaling, Eric, 2020. "Testing for asymmetry in monetary policy rule for small-open developing economies: Multiscale Bayesian quantile evidence from Ghana," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    15. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    16. Pichler, Anton & Poledna, Sebastian & Thurner, Stefan, 2021. "Systemic risk-efficient asset allocations: Minimization of systemic risk as a network optimization problem," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Peter A. Abken & Milind M. Shrikhande, 1997. "The role of currency derivatives in internationally diversified portfolios," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 82(Q 3), pages 34-59.
    18. Dhanya Jothimani & Ravi Shankar & Surendra S. Yadav, 2018. "A Big data analytical framework for portfolio optimization," Papers 1811.07188, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2018.
    19. Leonard J. Mirman & Egas M. Salgueiro & Marc Santugini, 2013. "Integrating Real and Financial Decisions of the Firm," Cahiers de recherche 1333, CIRPEE.
    20. Dominique Guégan & Wayne Tarrant, 2012. "On the necessity of five risk measures," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 533-552, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk analysis; Monte Carlo; Portfolio diversification; Commodity futures;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:revfin:v:25:y:2015:i:c:p:19-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.