IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v95y2024ics105905602400443x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital structure and corporate litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhi
  • Liu, Yue
  • Huang, Wenxuan

Abstract

This paper selects the data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2011 to 2022 as a sample to explore the relationship between capital structure and corporate litigation and finds that an unreasonable capital structure increases the litigation risk of enterprises. A reasonable capital structure not only helps enterprises maintain a sound financial position and efficient decision-making mechanism in litigation but also reduces their legal risks and improves their competitiveness; the role of capital structure on corporate litigation risk is more significant in regions with low rule of law than in areas with high rule of law. Firms may be more inclined to choose a robust capital structure to reduce litigation risk in areas with a strict legal environment and high investor protection. On the contrary, in regions with relatively lax legal environments and low levels of investor protection, firms may be more inclined to choose risky capital structures in pursuit of higher returns, but this also increases their exposure to litigation risk; financing constraints play a mediating role in the relationship between capital structure and corporate litigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhi & Liu, Yue & Huang, Wenxuan, 2024. "Capital structure and corporate litigation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s105905602400443x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602400443X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s105905602400443x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.