IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v94y2024ics1059056024003484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does haze-related sentiment affect income inequality in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Minjia
  • Zong, Xiangyu
  • Guo, Lubingzhi
  • Lei, Yongyu

Abstract

We investigate the effect of haze-related sentiment on urban–rural income inequality of prefecture-level cities in China. Income inequality is captured by the Theil index, the ratio and the difference between urban–rural income. We use GPT-3.5 models to conduct the sentiment analysis on the haze-related posts retrieved from the Weibo platform from 2018 to 2021. The generated emotion score and the number of posts are used to construct the haze-related sentiment measure. We find that haze-related unhappiness exacerbates urban–rural income inequality. The net population flow is investigated as the mechanism, indicating that negative sentiment reduces the net flows of both the floating population and resident population and consequently increases income inequality. The heterogeneity analysis finds that the effects of haze-related unhappiness on income inequality are smaller in cities with more hospital beds, doctors, and green spaces. Furthermore, the effects of the sentiment measure on income inequality vary significantly across cities in different geographic locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Minjia & Zong, Xiangyu & Guo, Lubingzhi & Lei, Yongyu, 2024. "Does haze-related sentiment affect income inequality in China?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024003484
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.05.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024003484
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.05.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sentiment analysis; Air pollution; Income inequality; Urban–rural inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024003484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.