IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v88y2023icp594-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does carbon risk amplify environmental uncertainty?

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Bin
  • Zhang, Jinlong
  • Liu, Xiaofeng

Abstract

This paper uses the Carbon Emissions Trading (CET) as a quasi-natural experiment to empirically test the impact of carbon risk on enterprise environmental uncertainty from the perspective of policy regulation in China. Using data from A-share listed enterprises from CET-covered enterprises, this paper uses multiphase difference-in-differences (DID) strategy and finds that carbon risk amplifies the uncertainty of the enterprise environment. The test of the intermediary effect indicates that institutional ownership and the change of the shareholding ratio of the largest shareholder play a partial intermediary role between carbon risk and environmental uncertainty. In addition, the analysis of industry and enterprise heterogeneity reveals that the impact is more significant on enterprises in the oil industry, enterprises with high financing constraints and insufficient investment, and non-state-owned enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Bin & Zhang, Jinlong & Liu, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Does carbon risk amplify environmental uncertainty?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 594-606.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:594-606
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023002071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mara Faccio & Maria-Teresa Marchica & Roberto Mura, 2011. "Large Shareholder Diversification and Corporate Risk-Taking," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(11), pages 3601-3641.
    2. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    3. Zhang, Cheng & Zhou, Bo & Tian, Xuan, 2022. "Political connections and green innovation: The role of a corporate entrepreneurship strategy in state-owned enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 375-384.
    4. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    5. Philipp Krueger & Zacharias Sautner & Laura T Starks, 2020. "The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 1067-1111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Ming & Wang, Xiaoxiao & Wang, Xuewu & Zhang, Qunzi, 2024. "Carbon risk and corporate maturity mismatch," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Liao, Tailai & Yan, Jingdong & Zhang, Qiuhong, 2024. "The impact of green technology innovation on carbon emission efficiency: The intermediary role of intellectual capital," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 520-532.
    3. Zhang, Jinlong & Wu, Mingyue & Chen, Tingwei & Gao, Bin, 2024. "Green credit, financing constraints, and corporate investment: From the perspectives of scale and efficiency," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Banerjee, Ameet Kumar & Özer, Zeynep Sueda & Rahman, Molla Ramizur & Sensoy, Ahmet, 2024. "How does the time-varying dynamics of spillover between clean and brown energy ETFs change with the intervention of climate risk and climate policy uncertainty?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 442-468.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shanyong & Xu, Baolong, 2024. "Environmental protection tax policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    2. Pan, Junyu & Du, Lizhao & Wu, Haitao & Liu, Xiaoqian, 2024. "Does environmental law enforcement supervision improve corporate carbon reduction performance? Evidence from environmental protection interview," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Han Hu & Shihui Yang & Lin Zeng & Xuesi Zhang, 2024. "U.S.–China trade conflicts and R&D investment: evidence from the BIS entity lists," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Tan, Xiujie & Xiao, Ziwei & Liu, Yishuang & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Wang, Banban & Dong, Hanmin, 2022. "The effect of green credit policy on energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Marco BECHT & Julian FRANKS & MIYAJIMA Hideaki & SUZUKI Kazunori, 2023. "Does Paying Passive Managers to Engage Improve ESG Performance?," Discussion papers 23077, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    6. Yan Zhang & Yuheng Liang, 2023. "Collusion or monitoring? Connected institutional investors and stock price crash risk in China," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 901-923, November.
    7. Caixe, Daniel Ferreira, 2022. "Corporate governance and investment sensitivity to policy uncertainty in Brazil," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(PB).
    8. Ivanov, Ivan T. & Pettit, Luke & Whited, Toni, 2021. "Taxes Depress Corporate Borrowing: Evidence from Private Firms," IHS Working Paper Series 32, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    9. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Panagiotis Koutroumpis & Yu Zhang, 2022. "CSR and Firm Survival: Evidence from the Climate and Pandemic Crises," Working Papers 935, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Chuanlin Wang & Guowan Yan & Juan Ou, 2023. "Does Digitization Promote Green Innovation? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Xu, Jia & Zeng, Shu & Qi, Shaozhou & Cui, Jingbo, 2023. "Do institutional investors facilitate corporate environmental innovation?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Hong, Jifeng & Kazakis, Pantelis & Strieborny, Martin, 2024. "Green Bond Issuance by Firms, External Monitoring, and Probability of Default: An Empirical Research Based on Green Policies," MPRA Paper 123049, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Annalisa Ferrando & Maria†Teresa Marchica & Roberto Mura, 2017. "Financial Flexibility and Investment Ability Across the Euro Area and the UK," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 23(1), pages 87-126, January.
    14. Jose, Amal & Bhaduri, Saumitra, 2024. "Promoter's share pledging and investment–The role of financial constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    15. Zhong, Tingyong & Ma, Fuqi & Sun, Fangcheng & Li, Jiangna, 2024. "Can green finance reduce corporate carbon risk?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Yin, Hongying & Qian, Yuting & Zhang, Bin & Pérez, Rebeca, 2023. "Urban construction and firm green innovation: Evidence from China's low-carbon pilot city initiative," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Jiang, Chun & Qiu, Yihan & Li, Xiao-Lin & Si, Deng-Kui, 2024. "Does stock market liberalization promote entrepreneurship?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 480-495.
    18. Jerch, Rhiannon & Kahn, Matthew E. & Lin, Gary C., 2023. "Local public finance dynamics and hurricane shocks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Tommaso Oliviero & Sandro Rondinella & Alberto Zazzaro, 2024. "Are green firms more financially constrained? The sensitivity of investment to cash flow," CSEF Working Papers 700, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    20. Liu, Guannan & Wang, Anqi & Wang, Kedi & Zhao, Qiuyun, 2024. "Shareholder bargaining power and labor income share: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:594-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.