IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v79y2017icp101-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural factors of sustainable energy development: A case study of geothermal energy in Iceland and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Shortall, Ruth
  • Kharrazi, Ali

Abstract

Energy is important for sustainable development, yet multidimensional challenges exist for policy makers in transformations to sustainable energy systems. Sustainable development is generally recognised as having a three-lens approach: development must balance impacts in the economic, environmental and cultural dimensions. While cultural themes such as governance, motivation, and social values are widely acknowledged in the literature as critical for transformations to sustainability, however, research on these themes has been scant. Culture influences many aspects of society; hence it is important to consider culture when developing policies for sustainable development. Understanding national cultures can lead to greater understanding of what shapes national policy and strategies for transformations to sustainable energy systems. Understanding cultural influences on policy can help other countries to overcome similar challenges in policy making, planning or local resource management. Comparisons between countries serve to further advance the understanding of approaches to such challenges. This paper examines transformations towards sustainable energy through the lens of culture, through a case study of geothermal development in Iceland and Japan. Using Hoftsede's cultural theory framework, we highlight cultural variables relevant to sustainability transformations, with particular emphasis on the challenges of the management of geothermal energy resources, and the management of related conflicts and public participation. We present our findings garnered from interviews with key players in the energy industry in both countries reinforced by an extensive literature review. We find that culture clearly influences the approach to geothermal energy development in both countries and we identify benefits and disadvantages to approaches on overlapping issues and challenges in both countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Shortall, Ruth & Kharrazi, Ali, 2017. "Cultural factors of sustainable energy development: A case study of geothermal energy in Iceland and Japan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 101-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:101-109
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117306652
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olafsson, Snjolfur & Cook, David & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Johannsdottir, Lara, 2014. "Measuring countries׳ environmental sustainability performance – A review and case study of Iceland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 934-948.
    2. Georgy Zadonsky, 2015. "Рынок Недвижимости Рф," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 3, pages 33-35, Март.
    3. Nikita Andrievskiy & Elizaveta Khudko, 2015. "Финансовые Рынки," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 3, pages 13-17, Март.
    4. Disli, Mustafa & Ng, Adam & Askari, Hossein, 2016. "Culture, income, and CO2 emission," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 418-428.
    5. Kubota, Hiromi & Hondo, Hiroki & Hienuki, Shunichi & Kaieda, Hideshi, 2013. "Determining barriers to developing geothermal power generation in Japan: Societal acceptance by stakeholders involved in hot springs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1079-1087.
    6. Naz Onel & Avinandan Mukherjee, 2014. "The effects of national culture and human development on environmental health," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 79-101, February.
    7. Gallego Carrera, Diana & Mack, Alexander, 2010. "Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 1030-1039, February.
    8. Nadezhda Volovik, 2015. "Внешняя Торговля," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 2, pages 22-25, Февраль.
    9. Faltsman V.K. & Davydova L.A., 2015. "Competitive and Innovative Growth of Russia," Published Papers 2305, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    10. Georgy Zadonsky, 2015. "Ипотека В Рф," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 2, pages 35-36, Февраль.
    11. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2016. "Differing cultures of energy security: An international comparison of public perceptions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 811-822.
    12. Okubo, Noriko, 2016. "The development of the Japanese legal system for public participation in land use and environmental matters," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 492-500.
    13. Georgy Zadonsky, 2015. "Рынок Недвижимости Рф," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 1, pages 38-41, Январь.
    14. Hoon Park & Clifford Russell & Junsoo Lee, 2007. "National culture and environmental sustainability: A cross-national analysis," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 31(1), pages 104-121, March.
    15. Nadezhda Volovik, 2015. "Внешняя Торговля," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 3, pages 29-32, Март.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houda Elmustapha & Thomas Hoppe & Hans Bressers, 2018. "Understanding Stakeholders’ Views and the Influence of the Socio-Cultural Dimension on the Adoption of Solar Energy Technology in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Xueliang Yuan & Xiaoyu Zhang & Jiaxin Liang & Qingsong Wang & Jian Zuo, 2017. "The Development of Building Energy Conservation in China: A Review and Critical Assessment from the Perspective of Policy and Institutional System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Xia, Liangyu & Zhang, Yabo, 2019. "An overview of world geothermal power generation and a case study on China—The resource and market perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 411-423.
    4. Janelle Knox‐Hayes & Shekhar Chandra & Jungwoo Chun, 2021. "The role of values in shaping sustainable development perspectives and outcomes: A case study of Iceland," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 363-377, March.
    5. Alsaleh, Mohd & Yang, Zhengyong & Chen, Tinggui & Wang, Xiaohui & Abdul-Rahim, Abdul Samad & Mahmood, Haider, 2023. "Moving toward environmental sustainability: Assessing the influence of geothermal power on carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 880-893.
    6. Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Mortha, Aline & Farabi-Asl, Hadi & Sarker, Tapan & Chapman, Andrew & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Fraser, Timothy, 2020. "Role of energy finance in geothermal power development in Japan," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 398-412.
    7. Rettig, E. & Fischhendler, I. & Schlecht, F., 2023. "The meaning of energy islands: Towards a theoretical framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Robertson Munro, Fiona & Cairney, Paul, 2020. "A systematic review of energy systems: The role of policymaking in sustainable transitions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Schumacher, Kim, 2019. "Approval procedures for large-scale renewable energy installations: Comparison of national legal frameworks in Japan, New Zealand, the EU and the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 139-152.
    10. Li, Hui & Ni, Long & Yao, Yang & Sun, Cheng, 2020. "Annual performance experiments of an earth-air heat exchanger fresh air-handling unit in severe cold regions: Operation, economic and greenhouse gas emission analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 25-37.
    11. Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir & C. Michael Hall, 2019. "Contested Development Paths and Rural communities: Sustainable Energy or Sustainable Tourism in Iceland?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Chi-Jui Huang & Heng-Yih Liu & Ting-Ling Lin & Jia-Yu Lai, 2024. "Revisiting Hofstede's dimensions of national culture and environmental sustainability," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(3), pages 1251-1269, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zehui Shao & Aleksander Vesel & Jin Xu, 2017. "Frequency assignment problem in networks with limited spectrum," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(3), pages 699-723, September.
    2. Zakari, Abdulrasheed & Toplak, Jurij, 2021. "Investigation into the social behavioural effects on a country's ecological footprint: Evidence from Central Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Silvia Rita Sedita & Silvia Blasi & Jiawen Yang, 2022. "The cultural dimensions of sustainable development: A cross‐country configurational analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1838-1849, December.
    4. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Luca Fraccascia & Alberto Nastasi, 2020. "National culture's influence on environmental performance of countries: A study of direct and indirect effects," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1773-1786, November.
    5. Disli, Mustafa & Ng, Adam & Askari, Hossein, 2016. "Culture, income, and CO2 emission," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 418-428.
    6. Alexandra Cotae & Laura Bacali, 2017. "The influence of national culture on business organizations' commitment to environment sustainability in the European Union," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 19-29, December.
    7. Song, Fei (Sophie) & Montabon, Frank & Xu, Yuhang, 2018. "The impact of national culture on corporate adoption of environmental management practices and their effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 313-328.
    8. Lu, Jing & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Adam Novotny & Inez Szeberin & Sándor Kovács & Domicián Máté, 2022. "National Culture and the Market Development of Battery Electric Vehicles in 21 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Jesús Peiró-Palomino & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo, 2019. "Is Social Capital Green? Cultural Features and Environmental Performance in the European Union," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(3), pages 795-822, March.
    11. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chih-Wei & Ho, Shan-Ju, 2022. "The dimension of green economy: Culture viewpoint," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 122-138.
    12. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Ana Paula Coelho Clauberg & Renato de Mello & Flávio José Simioni & Simone Sehnem, 2021. "System for assessing the sustainability conditions of small hydro plants by fuzzy logic," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 300-317, March.
    14. Baudry, Gino & Delrue, Florian & Legrand, Jack & Pruvost, Jérémy & Vallée, Thomas, 2017. "The challenge of measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 933-947.
    15. Cebotari Livia & Paierele Ada, 2024. "Economic Effects of rising Energy Prices," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 295-302.
    16. Huang, Beijia & Zhang, Long & Ma, Linmao & Bai, Wuliyasu & Ren, Jingzheng, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis of China’s energy security from 2008 to 2017 based on Fuzzy BWM-DEA-AR model and Malmquist Productivity Index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. Raimo, Nicola & Zito, Marianna & Caragnano, Alessandra, 2019. "Does national culture affect integrated reporting quality? A focus on GLOBE dimensions," EconStor Conference Papers 199012, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Evgeny Lisin & Wadim Strielkowski & Veronika Chernova & Alena Fomina, 2018. "Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Fouladvand, Javanshir & Aranguren Rojas, Maria & Hoppe, Thomas & Ghorbani, Amineh, 2022. "Simulating thermal energy community formation: Institutional enablers outplaying technological choice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    20. Makkonen, Mari & Pätäri, Satu & Jantunen, Ari & Viljainen, Satu, 2012. "Competition in the European electricity markets – outcomes of a Delphi study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 431-440.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:101-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.