IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v203y2024ics1364032124004970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentivizing energy and carbon rights transactions among network-constrained energy hubs: Cooperative game with externalities

Author

Listed:
  • Gan, Wei
  • Yan, Mingyu
  • Zhou, Yue
  • Shu, Kangan
  • Yao, Wei
  • Wen, Jinyu

Abstract

Joint energy and carbon rights transactions for multiple energy hubs could boost the utilization of renewable distributed energy resources and reduce carbon emissions in energy sectors. The joint transaction mechanism based on the cooperative game is proposed, in which cooperative energy hubs form a grand coalition to share diverse forms of energy and carbon rights in order to maximize their total benefit. Furthermore, the grand coalition-based transaction mechanism is augmented with network constraints to account for the influence of network constraints on the trading behaviors of energy hubs, which is mathematically represented as a cooperative game with externalities. In addition, mathematical proof is provided to demonstrate the stability of the formed network-constrained grand coalition. To determine the trading behaviors and allocate payoff among energy hubs while satisfying both network constraints and coalition stability, a scalable two-stage optimization structure is provided, with the first stage ensuring coalition stability and the second preventing network constraint violations. A solution technique combined with Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions and Benders decomposition is proposed to solve the two-stage optimization problem. The effectiveness and scalability of the proposed joint transaction mechanism and the solution technique are supported by numerical results for the 4-EH and 33-EH systems. The introduction of the carbon market leads to a 20.6 % reduction in carbon emissions and a 10.5 % increase in total payoff by facilitating peer-to-peer trading of both energy and carbon rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Gan, Wei & Yan, Mingyu & Zhou, Yue & Shu, Kangan & Yao, Wei & Wen, Jinyu, 2024. "Incentivizing energy and carbon rights transactions among network-constrained energy hubs: Cooperative game with externalities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004970
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004970
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parkash Chander & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "The Core of an Economy with Multilateral Environmental Externalities," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 153-175, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Eyckmans & Michael Finus, 2006. "New roads to international environmental agreements: the case of global warming," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(4), pages 391-414, December.
    2. Maria Gabriella Graziano & Vincenzo Platino, 2024. "A measure of social loss for production economies with externalities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(2), pages 443-474, September.
    3. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    4. Dritan Osmani & Richard S.J. Tol, 2008. "Evolution in time of Farsightedly Stable Coalitions: An Application of FUND," Working Papers FNU-162, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised May 2008.
    5. Parkash Chandler & Henry Tulkens & Jean-Pascal Ypersele & Stephane Willems, 2006. "The Kyoto Protocol: An Economic and Game Theoretic Interpretation," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 195-215, Springer.
    6. Dávid Csercsik & László Á. Kóczy, 2017. "Efficiency and Stability in Electrical Power Transmission Networks: a Partition Function Form Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1161-1184, December.
    7. Christian Pietro & Maria Gabriella Graziano & Vincenzo Platino, 2022. "Social loss with respect to the core of an economy with externalities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 487-508, April.
    8. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    9. Casas, Omar J. & Romera, Rosario, 2011. "The international stock pollutant control: a stochastic formulation with transfers," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws112217, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    10. Ansink, Erik & Gengenbach, Michael & Weikard, Hans-Peter, 2012. "River Sharing and Water Trade," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 122860, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    11. Massol, Olivier & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2018. "Capturing industrial CO2 emissions in Spain: Infrastructures, costs and break-even prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 545-560.
    12. Aymeric Lardon, 2019. "On the coalitional stability of monopoly power in differentiated Bertrand and Cournot oligopolies," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(4), pages 421-449, November.
    13. Johan Eyckmans & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Simulating Coalitionally Stable Burden Sharing Agreements for the Climate Change Problem," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 218-249, Springer.
    14. Stéphane Gonzalez & Aymeric Lardon, 2018. "Optimal deterrence of cooperation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(1), pages 207-227, March.
    15. Effrosyni Diamantoudi & Eftichios S. Sartzetakis, 2006. "Stable International Environmental Agreements: An Analytical Approach," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 8(2), pages 247-263, May.
    16. Takaaki Abe, 2019. "Buck-passing Dumping in a Pure Exchange Game of Bads," Working Papers 1918, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    17. Zili Yang, 2016. "Mitigation Cost And Climate Damage Versus Incentive Shifts Of Climate Coalition," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(04), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Thijssen, J.J.J., 2003. "Investment under uncertainty, market evolution and coalition spillovers in a game theoretic perspective," Other publications TiSEM 672073a6-492e-4621-8d4a-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Aslan, Fatma & Lainé, Jean, 2020. "Competitive equilibria in Shapley–Scarf markets with couples," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 66-78.
    20. László Kóczy, 2007. "A recursive core for partition function form games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 41-51, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.