IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v161y2022ics1364032122002386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban green rating systems: Insights for balancing sustainable principles and heritage conservation for neighbourhood and cities renovation planning

Author

Listed:
  • Lucchi, E.
  • Buda, A.

Abstract

The paper presents an overview of existing urban sustainability rating tools for their possible application in historic urban environments, facing the debate between environmental sustainability and urban heritage conservation. This critical study focuses on Urban Green Rating Systems (UGRS) that make a transparent and systematic decision-making support tool for evaluating the sustainability in urban planning, combining environmental, economic, and social aspects. The research aims at comparing different UGRS approaches for cities and neighbourhood renovation, highlighting main themes, criteria, indicators, pros, and cons to balance heritage preservation and sustainable development. All the UGRS give high importance to environmental aspects while lower or no consideration is dedicated to heritage conservation. Thus, gaps in the methodological approaches to be addressed in the future have been identified, to serve as a guideline and reference for developing a comprehensive, international assessment system to bridge this knowledge and applicability gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucchi, E. & Buda, A., 2022. "Urban green rating systems: Insights for balancing sustainable principles and heritage conservation for neighbourhood and cities renovation planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122002386
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122002386
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, Wei & Yu, Cong & Bai, Yefei & Du, Jia, 2023. "A four-level hierarchical framework for reviewing infrastructure sustainability assessment systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Dimitris Giannakopoulos & Zografia Karekou & Elli Menegaki & Elisavet Tsilimantou & Charalabos Ioannidis & Eleni Maistrou & Antonios Giannikouris & Antonia Moropoulou, 2022. "Reuse of Historic Buildings in the Medieval City of Rhodes to Comply with the Needs of Sustainable Urban Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:161:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122002386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.