IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v15y2011i1p603-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Integrated Concentrating Photovoltaics: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Chemisana, Daniel

Abstract

For building integration, Concentrating Photovoltaic (CPV) systems can offer a host of advantages over conventional flat panel devices, the most notable being: a higher electrical conversion efficiency in the PV cells, better use of space, ease of recycling of constituent materials, and reduced use of toxic products involved in the PV cells' production process. However, the viability of Building-Integrated Concentrating PV (BICPV) systems is dependent on their ability to offer a comparative economic advantage over flat panel photovoltaic technologies whose market prices are decreasing from day to day and which offer other advantages such as ease of replacement of structural elements. A comparative analysis is presented of the main existing CPV systems' suitability for use in buildings, in which the different challenges specific to integration of each system are discussed. The systems are categorized by type of concentration technology and concentration factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Chemisana, Daniel, 2011. "Building Integrated Concentrating Photovoltaics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 603-611, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:1:p:603-611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364-0321(10)00197-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 1997. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 51(1), pages 162-163, October.
    2. N/A, 1997. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(3), pages 540-546, April.
    3. N/A, 1997. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(2), pages 368-370, January.
    4. N/A, 1997. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(4), pages 709-711, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian Tiong Weng, 2017. "Leadership and Communication in HCMC, Vietnam," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 111-111, May.
    2. Cristiano PERUGINI & Paolo POLINORI & Marcello SIGNORELLI, 2005. "An empirical analysis of employment and growth dynamics in the Italian and Polish regions," Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica 06/2005, Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia.
    3. Viorel Rotila, 2018. "The Smartphone is One of the Externalizations of the Mind that Aspires to the Status of its Extension," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 65-97, December.
    4. Shireen Shymala Thomas & Sathiavani M. Santhiran & Irfah Najihah Basir Malan & Ian Mackechnie & William Chua, 2021. "The Antecedents of Job Satisfaction amongst Academicians: An Empirical Evidence from a Malaysian Private University," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 141-141, January.
    5. Jessica P. Fefer & Sandra De-Urioste Stone & John Daigle & Linda Silka, 2016. "Using the Delphi Technique to Identify Key Elements for Effective and Sustainable Visitor Use Planning Frameworks," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    6. Saif Benjaafar & Sunderesh S. Heragu & Shahrukh A. Irani, 2002. "Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 58-76, December.
    7. P. Barnwal & G. N. Tiwari, 2008. "Life cycle energy metrics and CO 2 credit analysis of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal greenhouse dryer," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 203-220, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:15:y:2011:i:1:p:603-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.