IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v69y2014icp74-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of stationary probabilistic models for wind speed records of varying duration

Author

Listed:
  • Arwade, Sanjay R.
  • Gioffrè, Massimiliano

Abstract

A method for assessing the degree of non-stationarity in annual wind speed records is presented. The method uses quantitative tests on the wind speed records to assess the length of the period over which an assumption of stationarity in the wind record can be considered to provide reasonable engineering accuracy. The tests evaluate stationarity in second moment properties and marginal distribution. Numerical examples are provided for three offshore sites along the Atlantic Coast of the United States–one off of Virginia, and two off of Maine. The examples illustrate that an assumption of stationarity over a period of one week is largely justified, but that such an assumption over periods of one month is certainly not. Assuming stationarity over a period of a week can lead to errors in model values of the second moment properties of 2%–3% whereas the assumption applied to a monthlong period can lead to error greater than 10%. Examination of the persistence of marginal distribution reveals that, although true stationarity in marginal distribution persists for a few days at most, there exist two ‘seasons’, winter and summer, during which the marginal distribution remains relatively consistent, with rapid changes in marginal distribution occurring near the beginning and ends of these seasons. Results are found to be largely consistent across the three sites investigated as numerical examples. The methods and results presented here may be useful to those investigating the potential for offshore wind energy development using stochastic process theory to study wind speed or power production since stationary stochastic models provide simpler and more accessible predictions of quantities such as probabilities of exceedance of threshold values, upcrossing rates, and residence times.

Suggested Citation

  • Arwade, Sanjay R. & Gioffrè, Massimiliano, 2014. "Validity of stationary probabilistic models for wind speed records of varying duration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 74-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:74-81
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114001591
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Heping & Erdem, Ergin & Shi, Jing, 2011. "Comprehensive evaluation of ARMA-GARCH(-M) approaches for modeling the mean and volatility of wind speed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 724-732, March.
    2. Pryor, S.C. & Barthelmie, R.J., 2010. "Climate change impacts on wind energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 430-437, January.
    3. Carta, J.A. & Ramírez, P. & Velázquez, S., 2009. "A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 933-955, June.
    4. Morgan, Vincent T., 1995. "Statistical distributions of wind parameters at Sydney, Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 39-47.
    5. Lackner, Matthew A. & Rogers, Anthony L. & Manwell, James F. & McGowan, Jon G., 2010. "A new method for improved hub height mean wind speed estimates using short-term hub height data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2340-2347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Jinrui & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2018. "Flexible wind speed generation model: Markov chain with an embedded diffusion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 316-328.
    2. Celik, Ali N. & Kolhe, Mohan, 2013. "Generalized feed-forward based method for wind energy prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 582-588.
    3. Kantar, Yeliz Mert & Usta, Ilhan & Arik, Ibrahim & Yenilmez, Ismail, 2018. "Wind speed analysis using the Extended Generalized Lindley Distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1024-1030.
    4. Bahrami, Arian & Teimourian, Amir & Okoye, Chiemeka Onyeka & Khosravi, Nima, 2019. "Assessing the feasibility of wind energy as a power source in Turkmenistan; a major opportunity for Central Asia's energy market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 415-427.
    5. Jung, Sungmoon & Arda Vanli, O. & Kwon, Soon-Duck, 2013. "Wind energy potential assessment considering the uncertainties due to limited data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1492-1503.
    6. Carta, José A. & Velázquez, Sergio & Cabrera, Pedro, 2013. "A review of measure-correlate-predict (MCP) methods used to estimate long-term wind characteristics at a target site," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 362-400.
    7. Jung, Christopher & Schindler, Dirk, 2019. "Wind speed distribution selection – A review of recent development and progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Han, Qinkai & Ma, Sai & Wang, Tianyang & Chu, Fulei, 2019. "Kernel density estimation model for wind speed probability distribution with applicability to wind energy assessment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Simon Watson, 2014. "Quantifying the variability of wind energy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 330-342, July.
    10. Díaz, Santiago & Carta, José A. & Matías, José M., 2018. "Performance assessment of five MCP models proposed for the estimation of long-term wind turbine power outputs at a target site using three machine learning techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 455-477.
    11. Hao Chen & Qiulan Wan & Yurong Wang, 2014. "Refined Diebold-Mariano Test Methods for the Evaluation of Wind Power Forecasting Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Wang, Jianzhou & Xiong, Shenghua, 2014. "A hybrid forecasting model based on outlier detection and fuzzy time series – A case study on Hainan wind farm of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 526-541.
    13. Omoyele, Olalekan & Hoffmann, Maximilian & Koivisto, Matti & Larrañeta, Miguel & Weinand, Jann Michael & Linßen, Jochen & Stolten, Detlef, 2024. "Increasing the resolution of solar and wind time series for energy system modeling: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    14. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    15. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    16. Tang, Jie & Brouste, Alexandre & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2015. "Some improvements of wind speed Markov chain modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 52-56.
    17. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Wind Energy Potential at Three Locations in South Korea Using Long-Term Measured Wind Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Aruna Kanagaraj & Kumudini Devi Raguru Pandu, 2020. "Investigations of Various Market Models in a Deregulated Power Environment Using ACOPF," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Spittler, Nathalie & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Shafiei, Ehsan & Diemer, Arnaud, 2021. "Implications of renewable resource dynamics for energy system planning: The case of geothermal and hydropower in Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    20. Botelho, D.F. & de Oliveira, L.W. & Dias, B.H. & Soares, T.A. & Moraes, C.A., 2022. "Integrated prosumers–DSO approach applied in peer-to-peer energy and reserve tradings considering network constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:74-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.