IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v230y2024ics0960148124009510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of different opening times on methanogenic potential of different fermentation types of silage during feed-out stage

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Jiali
  • Luo, Xuan
  • Zhou, Min
  • Zhang, Qi
  • Wang, Yunpu
  • Ruan, Roger
  • Liu, Yuhuan
  • Cui, Xian

Abstract

Aerobic deterioration of silage material is unavoidable during the feed-out stage; therefore, in this study, the influence of the feed-out stage on the methanogenic potential of different silage fermentation types was evaluated. Lactic acid in corn straw silage was the first substance to be completely consumed by 3 days after opening and the pH increased substantially. In homolactic fermentation, yeast and mold proliferated in an aerobic environment; the organic dry matter loss rate was less than 2.0% and cumulative methane yieldorig reduction rate was only 3.9% at 1 day after opening than silage storage. However, these values increased to 18.9% and 34.9%, respectively, 3 days after opening, which were much higher than those obtained under non-homolactic fermentation. Therefore, a feed-out frequency of no more than one day is recommended in practical engineering applications. Meanwhile, promoting non-homolactic fermentation can improve the aerobic stability of raw materials and reduce energy loss.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Jiali & Luo, Xuan & Zhou, Min & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Yunpu & Ruan, Roger & Liu, Yuhuan & Cui, Xian, 2024. "Effect of different opening times on methanogenic potential of different fermentation types of silage during feed-out stage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:230:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124009510
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124009510
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Villa, Raffaella & Ortega Rodriguez, Lelia & Fenech, Cecilia & Anika, Ogemdi Chinwendu, 2020. "Ensiling for anaerobic digestion: A review of key considerations to maximise methane yields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Zeng, Xianyang & Ma, Yitai & Ma, Lirong, 2007. "Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 976-987, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karol Kupryaniuk & Kamil Witaszek & Iryna Vaskina & Sebastian Filipek-Kaźmierczak & Jakub Kupryaniuk & Piotr Sołowiej & Jacek Dach, 2025. "The Effect of Corn Ensiling Methods on Digestibility and Biogas Yield," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Hu, Zhongfa & Wang, Xuebin & Zhang, Lan & Yang, Shunzhi & Ruan, Renhui & Bai, Shengjie & Zhu, Yiming & Wang, Liang & Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Tan, Houzhang, 2020. "Emission characteristics of particulate matters from a 30 MW biomass-fired power plant in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 225-236.
    3. Chen, Xiaoguang, 2016. "Economic potential of biomass supply from crop residues in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 141-149.
    4. Huang, Jintao & Lyu, Sha & Han, He & Wang, Yanjiang & Sun, Haoyang & Su, Jingtao & Liu, Yidong & Min, Yonggang & Sun, Dazhi, 2022. "Enhanced looping biomass/vapour gasification utilizing waste heat from molten copper slags," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Akwukwaegbu, P. I. & Peters, D. E. & Wegwu, M. O., 2016. "Yield of Ethanol Produced from Waste Pod of Fluted Pumpkin (Telfairia Occidentalis) Using African Giant Snail (Archachatina Marginata) Slime and Yeast," Scientific Review, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(6), pages 74-78, 06-2016.
    6. Xiao Chen & Tao Tao & Jiaxin Zhou & Helong Yu & Hongliang Guo & Hongbing Chen, 2023. "Simulation and Prediction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Yin, Dongxue & Liu, Wei & Zhai, Ningning & Wang, Yandong & Ren, Chengjie & Yang, Gaihe, 2017. "Regional differentiation of rural household biogas development and related driving factors in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1008-1018.
    8. Ma, Hengyun & Oxley, Les & Gibson, John & Li, Wen, 2010. "A survey of China's renewable energy economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 438-445, January.
    9. Zhang, Shuangqi & Deng, Mengsi & Shan, Ming & Zhou, Chuang & Liu, Wei & Xu, Xiaoqiu & Yang, Xudong, 2019. "Energy and environmental impact assessment of straw return and substitution of straw briquettes for heating coal in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 654-664.
    10. Zhang, Kai & Chang, Jian & Guan, Yanjun & Chen, Honggang & Yang, Yongping & Jiang, Jianchun, 2013. "Lignocellulosic biomass gasification technology in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 175-184.
    11. Cui, Xiaohui & Guo, Liyue & Li, Caihong & Liu, Meizhen & Wu, Guanglei & Jiang, Gaoming, 2021. "The total biomass nitrogen reservoir and its potential of replacing chemical fertilizers in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Zheng, Y.H. & Li, Z.F. & Feng, S.F. & Lucas, M. & Wu, G.L. & Li, Y. & Li, C.H. & Jiang, G.M., 2010. "Biomass energy utilization in rural areas may contribute to alleviating energy crisis and global warming: A case study in a typical agro-village of Shandong, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3132-3139, December.
    13. Yanran Fu & Tao Luo & Zili Mei & Jiang Li & Kun Qiu & Yihong Ge, 2018. "Dry Anaerobic Digestion Technologies for Agricultural Straw and Acceptability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Yin, Huajun & Zhao, Wenqiang & Li, Ting & Cheng, Xinying & Liu, Qing, 2018. "Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China: Role of straw nutrient resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2695-2702.
    15. Shichun Du & Jing Liu & Zetian Fu, 2021. "The Impact of Village Rules and Formal Environmental Regulations on Farmers’ Cleaner Production Behavior: New Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Gao, Mingxue & Wang, Danmeng & Wang, Hui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Biogas potential, utilization and countermeasures in agricultural provinces: A case study of biogas development in Henan Province, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 191-200.
    17. Zhang, Weishi & Wang, Can & Zhang, Long & Xu, Ying & Cui, Yuanzheng & Lu, Zifeng & Streets, David G., 2018. "Evaluation of the performance of distributed and centralized biomass technologies in rural China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 445-455.
    18. Jin, Chao & Yao, Mingfa & Liu, Haifeng & Lee, Chia-fon F. & Ji, Jing, 2011. "Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 4080-4106.
    19. Ren, Qiangqiang & Zhao, Changsui, 2015. "Evolution of fuel-N in gas phase during biomass pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 408-418.
    20. Liu, Beibei & Wu, Qiaoran & Wang, Feng & Zhang, Bing, 2019. "Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 393-402.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:230:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124009510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.