IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v224y2024ics0960148124001873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physics-Informed Neural Network surrogate model for bypassing Blade Element Momentum theory in wind turbine aerodynamic load estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Baisthakur, Shubham
  • Fitzgerald, Breiffni

Abstract

This paper proposes the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), specifically Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), for dynamic surrogate modelling of wind turbines. PINNs offer the flexibility to model complex relationships while incorporating physics-based constraints, enabling accurate representation of wind turbine dynamics. In this paper, a PINN-based surrogate model is developed for the Blade Element Momentum (BEM) aerodynamic model used in state-of-the-art numerical wind turbine simulations. The PINN model replaces the time-consuming root-finding process in BEM with high-dimensional regression, significantly improving computational efficiency. The PINN model is trained using data generated from a numerical model of the IEA-15MW reference wind turbine, and its performance is compared against conventional data-driven Neural Network (DDNN) models. The proposed surrogate model provides more efficient and accurate evaluations of wind turbine responses compared with traditional surrogate modelling approaches. A significant computational advantage is obtained by using the developed surrogate models with a forty-fold speedup demonstrated compared to the BEM model. Replacing the BEM model with the PINN-based surrogate model for load computation in the numerical model used for dynamic analysis results in an overall reduction of 35% in computational time for a complete dynamic simulation. This is a substantial improvement in efficiency without sacrificing accuracy — the maximum Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values for the surrogate models are of the order of 10−2, which shows that the surrogate models can predict the angle of attack at any blade node with a discrepancy of less than 0.5°. The surrogate models significantly reduce computational time while maintaining high accuracy, making them a promising approach for simulating wind turbine dynamics, especially in fields such as reliability analysis or fatigue estimation where many simulations are necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Baisthakur, Shubham & Fitzgerald, Breiffni, 2024. "Physics-Informed Neural Network surrogate model for bypassing Blade Element Momentum theory in wind turbine aerodynamic load estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124001873
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124001873
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Slot, René M.M. & Sørensen, John D. & Sudret, Bruno & Svenningsen, Lasse & Thøgersen, Morten L., 2020. "Surrogate model uncertainty in wind turbine reliability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1150-1162.
    2. Fitzgerald, Breiffni & McAuliffe, James & Baisthakur, Shubham & Sarkar, Saptarshi, 2023. "Enhancing the reliability of floating offshore wind turbine towers subjected to misaligned wind-wave loading using tuned mass damper inerters (TMDIs)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 522-538.
    3. Heleen L. Soest & Michel G. J. Elzen & Detlef P. Vuuren, 2021. "Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    5. Esteban, M. Dolores & Diez, J. Javier & López, Jose S. & Negro, Vicente, 2011. "Why offshore wind energy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 444-450.
    6. Njiri, Jackson G. & Söffker, Dirk, 2016. "State-of-the-art in wind turbine control: Trends and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 377-393.
    7. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    8. Yang, Hezhen & Zhu, Yun & Lu, Qijin & Zhang, Jun, 2015. "Dynamic reliability based design optimization of the tripod sub-structure of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 16-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kadoche, Elie & Gourvénec, Sébastien & Pallud, Maxime & Levent, Tanguy, 2023. "MARLYC: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Yaw Control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Shu, Z.R. & Li, Q.S. & Chan, P.W., 2015. "Investigation of offshore wind energy potential in Hong Kong based on Weibull distribution function," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 362-373.
    3. Sant’Anna de Sousa Gomes, Mateus & Faulstich de Paiva, Jane Maria & Aparecida da Silva Moris, Virgínia & Nunes, Andréa Oliveira, 2019. "Proposal of a methodology to use offshore wind energy on the southeast coast of Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 327-336.
    4. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2016. "Co-located wind and wave energy farms: Uniformly distributed arrays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 497-508.
    6. Zhao, Xin-gang & Ren, Ling-zhi, 2015. "Focus on the development of offshore wind power in China: Has the golden period come?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 644-657.
    7. Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Gallo-Marazuela, D. & Pastor-Sánchez, A. & Carro-Calvo, L. & Portilla-Figueras, A. & Prieto, L., 2014. "Offshore wind farm design with the Coral Reefs Optimization algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 109-115.
    8. Zountouridou, E.I. & Kiokes, G.C. & Chakalis, S. & Georgilakis, P.S. & Hatziargyriou, N.D., 2015. "Offshore floating wind parks in the deep waters of Mediterranean Sea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 433-448.
    9. Al-Nassar, W.K. & Neelamani, S. & Al-Salem, K.A. & Al-Dashti, H.A., 2019. "Feasibility of offshore wind energy as an alternative source for the state of Kuwait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 783-796.
    10. Yang, Haoze & Ge, Mingwei & Abkar, Mahdi & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2022. "Large-eddy simulation study of wind turbine array above swell sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Subbulakshmi, A. & Verma, Mohit & Keerthana, M. & Sasmal, Saptarshi & Harikrishna, P. & Kapuria, Santosh, 2022. "Recent advances in experimental and numerical methods for dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines — An integrated review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    13. Bon-Yong Koo & Dae-Yi Jung, 2019. "A Comparative Study on Primary Bearing Rating Life of a 5-MW Two-Blade Wind Turbine System Based on Two Different Control Domains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Salman, Muhammad & Long, Xingle & Wang, Guimei & Zha, Donglan, 2022. "Paris climate agreement and global environmental efficiency: New evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Luengo, Jorge & Negro, Vicente & García-Barba, Javier & López-Gutiérrez, José-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2019. "New detected uncertainties in the design of foundations for offshore Wind Turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 667-677.
    16. Kılkış, Şiir & Ulpiani, Giulia & Vetters, Nadja, 2024. "Visions for climate neutrality and opportunities for co-learning in European cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Zhang, Hui & Zhou, Peng & Sun, Xiumei & Ni, Guanqun, 2024. "Disparities in energy efficiency and its determinants in Chinese cities: From the perspective of heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    18. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    19. Luis M. Abadie & José M. Chamorro, 2014. "Valuation of Wind Energy Projects: A Real Options Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-38, May.
    20. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1121-1130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:224:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124001873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.