IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v134y2019icp669-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic metrics in predicting daylight availability and visual comfort in classrooms

Author

Listed:
  • Zomorodian, Zahra S.
  • Tahsildoost, Mohammad

Abstract

In this study, daylight performance and visual comfort have been evaluated by a longitudinal subjective survey (842 total responses) and simulation-based metrics in four classrooms in two LEED™ silver certified buildings during a year. Dynamic and static daylight and glare metrics are reviewed and critiqued based upon their ability to explain the perception of human subjective responses in classrooms. Results indicate high correlation between students' perceptions and dynamic daylight metrics; sDA300/50% and UDI300-3000/50%, in defining the daylit area. Moreover, according to results the Vertical illuminance-based metrics (sDGPexceed) is more compatible than horizontal illuminance-based metrics (ASE) at fitting the range of perceived discomfort glare. However, more and larger studies are needed to confirm utilizing the sDGPexceed index for indication of discomfort glare in early stage of building design. According to results, daylight and glare metrics' thresholds should be reconsidered based on global filed surveys, since occupants' ability to adapt to higher or lower levels of light is related to culture and climate location.

Suggested Citation

  • Zomorodian, Zahra S. & Tahsildoost, Mohammad, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic metrics in predicting daylight availability and visual comfort in classrooms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 669-680.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:134:y:2019:i:c:p:669-680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118313910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, M.C. & Garg, S.N., 2010. "Illuminance estimation and daylighting energy savings for Indian regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 703-711.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Li & Qichao Ban & Xueming (Jimmy) Chen & Jiawei Yao, 2019. "Glazing Sizing in Large Atrium Buildings: A Perspective of Balancing Daylight Quantity and Visual Comfort," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    3. Alexander Rani Suryandono & Agus Hariyadi & Hiroatsu Fukuda, 2021. "Economic Assessment of L-Shaped Minilouvers for Reducing Cooling Energy and Improving Daylight Condition in Offices: A Simulation Study in Jakarta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Jack Ngarambe & Amina Irakoze & Geun Young Yun & Gon Kim, 2020. "Comparative Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Prediction of Indoor Daylight Illuminances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi, Fang'ai & Zhang, Jianxun & Li, Gaomei & Zhu, Zongzhou & Bart, Dewancker, 2019. "An investigation of the impact of Building Azimuth on energy consumption in sizhai traditional dwellings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 594-614.
    2. Li, Danny H.W. & Chau, T.C. & Wan, Kevin K.W., 2014. "A review of the CIE general sky classification approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 563-574.
    3. Das, Aparna & Paul, Saikat Kumar, 2015. "Artificial illumination during daytime in residential buildings: Factors, energy implications and future predictions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 65-85.
    4. Janjai, S. & Prathumsit, J. & Buntoung, S. & Wattan, R. & Pattarapanitchai, S. & Masiri, I., 2014. "Modeling the luminous efficacy of direct and diffuse solar radiation using information on cloud, aerosol and water vapor in the tropics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 111-117.
    5. Alshaibani, K.A., 2017. "Classification Standard Skies: The use of horizontal sky illuminance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 387-392.
    6. Tíba, C. & Leal, S.S., 2012. "Measuring and modelling illuminance in the semi-arid Northeast of Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 464-472.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:134:y:2019:i:c:p:669-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.